It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by Eryiedes
I do sleep well at night knowing Starwars is a space soap opera for the less intellectually challenged.
Which is more fun? Star wars.
Which is more realistic? Star trek.
Which has better tech? Star trek.
Which would win? Star wars.
reply to post by vkey08
You mean "Death Star II" for the win don't you?
How exactly can a Borg ship adapt to a weapon with enough firepower to reduce it to component atoms in a single shot?
-Live Long and Prosper-
reply to post by pennylemon
You are correct.
It is three minutes.
That doesn't really change anything...two minutes vs three?
Most Trek ship mounted phasers still cycle in the same amount of time. Since the Borg don't use fighters it's doubtful they would exploit it's sole weakness.
Also the Borg must survive a shot in order to adapt to the technology so, it would appear you are right back at square one with "reduced to component atoms".
Lastly the analogy was most powerful single ship...not a fleet of ships.
I mean I could do that too.
"If I had a fleet of Death Stars..."
Aside from that it's good night Gracie.
-Peace-edit on 28-1-2014 by Eryiedes because: Typoedit on 28-1-2014 by Eryiedes because: Typo