It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1.Why would health care costs skyrocket when this come into effect?
2. Why is Obamacare being blamed for skyrocketing costs when costs were already skyrocketing in the first place?
3. When hospitals are almost like cable companies and have monopolies over entire areas, how can we expect our prices to go down?
6. Would price fixing common procedures be a viable solution?
8. People blame law suits for many of the costs of healthcare? Should we relax the rules or standards of care to cheapen the costs?
10. Should we allow companies deny coverage for pre-existing conditions?
1.Why would health care costs skyrocket when this come into effect?
2. Why is Obamacare being blamed for skyrocketing costs when costs were already skyrocketing in the first place? I know when I first paid for heath insurance over a decade ago I paid 22 dollars biweekly. I have paid up 630 dollars monthly (with wife and child, no special medical conditions) in which I would have aid 250 dollars for single. These were kind of the jumps I have seen when Obamacare wasn't even a thought.
3. When hospitals are almost like cable companies and have monopolies over entire areas, how can we expect our prices to go down?
4. Does anyone think that we should leave the healthcare system alone? And why?
5. If you believe in deregulation, why do you believe pricing may go down? Even though I understand the costs that may go into many parts of healthcare, I do not believe if we all of the sudden made it cheaper for some of the private businesses in the healthcare field that those businesses would pass on those savings to the customer or use the extra money to pay for greater wages or more people.
6. Would price fixing common procedures be a viable solution?
7. Now many believe that the some of the other socialized healthcare systems are better. Why are they better or not better than what we have?
8. People blame law suits for many of the costs of healthcare? Should we relax the rules or standards of care to cheapen the costs?
9. If poor people without insurance are still being treated in hospitals and not paying, aren't those costs being passed on to those of us that do pay anyway? What is the difference?
10. Should we allow companies deny coverage for pre-existing conditions? If so, what happens to people like those who were victims of crimes, accidents, and even situations like the Boston bombing who can be considered people with pre-existing conditions? Should people be denied healthcare because of things that have happened out of their control?
1.Why would health care costs skyrocket when this come into effect?
2. Why is Obamacare being blamed for skyrocketing costs when costs were already skyrocketing in the first place? I know when I first paid for heath insurance over a decade ago I paid 22 dollars biweekly. I have paid up 630 dollars monthly (with wife and child, no special medical conditions) in which I would have aid 250 dollars for single. These were kind of the jumps I have seen when Obamacare wasn't even a thought.
3. When hospitals are almost like cable companies and have monopolies over entire areas, how can we expect our prices to go down?
4. Does anyone think that we should leave the healthcare system alone? And why?
5. If you believe in deregulation, why do you believe pricing may go down? Even though I understand the costs that may go into many parts of healthcare, I do not believe if we all of the sudden made it cheaper for some of the private businesses in the healthcare field that those businesses would pass on those savings to the customer or use the extra money to pay for greater wages or more people.
6. Would price fixing common procedures be a viable solution?
7. Now many believe that the some of the other socialized healthcare systems are better. Why are they better or not better than what we have?
8. People blame law suits for many of the costs of healthcare? Should we relax the rules or standards of care to cheapen the costs?
9. If poor people without insurance are still being treated in hospitals and not paying, aren't those costs being passed on to those of us that do pay anyway? What is the difference?
10. Should we allow companies deny coverage for pre-existing conditions?
1.Why would health care costs skyrocket when this come into effect?
2. Why is Obamacare being blamed for skyrocketing costs when costs were already skyrocketing in the first place? I know when I first paid for heath insurance over a decade ago I paid 22 dollars biweekly. I have paid up 630 dollars monthly (with wife and child, no special medical conditions) in which I would have aid 250 dollars for single. These were kind of the jumps I have seen when Obamacare wasn't even a thought.
Originally posted by clarkness
Littled16: To follow up with you first. You said in question 1 that whenever the government forces people to purchase something that those companies selling the product jack up the prices. Now if there is a government option that hopefully would be priced to cover the expenses that is needed and cover the overhead of of said government entity, wouldn't you think that it would be cheaper and therefore drive prices down over the private insurance companies?
For question 3, I should have made myself a bit more clear. I understand that more populated areas will have many hospitals, but for the most part, if you are a situation that requires you to get emergency medical attention, you may not have the choice on which hospital to go to. And much of the time, even if you have multiple hospitals in an area, they are under the same company in which you have no choice in pricing to even compare unless you go outside your general area.
For question 6, but when it comes to regulations and price fixing, isn't government interference just backdoor socialism?
Totallackey: When I said monopolies, I was mainly referring to emergency situations in which you do not get a choice in hospitals to go to rather than you go to the nearest hospital in technically that hospital is basically the only hospital you will go to in life-threatening conversations. In someone is in need of medical treatment quickly, the EMTs will more than likely chose the closest rather than cheapest.
I don't think the government screws up everything it touches, but it does have problems keeping up with technology and better ideas.
Now in question 5, you said anytime overhead and operating expenses are reduced, cost savings are past onto the customer. Now this happens a lot with new technologies such as TVs, VCRs, cameras and so on. Even new product business will lower their prices sometimes either to create more demand or to stay competitive, but in the medical field, the demand for medical care never really changes in fact it normally goes up because our population is growing so when will the operating costs ever go down enough to lower cost to consumers without it affecting their profit margin?
Now question 7, in most studies, many countries around the world have better healthcare ratings in longevity, birthing, mental health, weight issues, and preventive medicine. They have the same technology as us, not much difference in wait times and generally have a healthier public. Usually in most of those world studies we tend to place in the 10-30th rank in individual areas. The WHO ranked us 37th in the latest study where places like Costa Rica, Columbia, and some African and Middle Eastern countries beat us. If we are the best country in the world, why are we not at the top of one of the most crucial areas?
About pro-bono work, few states even require lawyers to do pro-bono work and as far as I know. Doctors are generally recommended to do 50 hours a year, but it is not a requirement. Besides, even taking out the wage of one doctor doesn't take care of the material costs and wages of techs and nurses.
And people with pre-existing conditions can get coverage but at a much greater cost, but then again not always