It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by 2012newstart
Wouldn't it be 20+1+3=24?
Seems you are changing numbers to fit your theory.
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by 2012newstart
Wouldn't it be 20+1+3=24?
Seems you are changing numbers to fit your theory.
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by Strawberry88
Yes you could add 20+13 or 201+3 if you wanted.
There is no reason you would have to add it up to equal six unless it was your goal to find 6 in that equation somehow, it certainly is not predictive. Just a coincidence.
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by Strawberry88
Even given that the math was correct, what is the relevance of 666 beyond a guess?
Is it written somewhere that when the date adds up to 666 that something bad is going to happen?
I don't recall reading that anywhere.
Originally posted by Strawberry88
Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by Strawberry88
Yes you could add 20+13 or 201+3 if you wanted.
There is no reason you would have to add it up to equal six unless it was your goal to find 6 in that equation somehow, it certainly is not predictive. Just a coincidence.
Op is using single digits, why do you insist on using multiples? 2+0+1+3 is 6, but if you want to use doubles it works as well. Nobody is looking for anything except for you. The single digits, when added up, equal 6 6 6, period.
Ridiculous, do you use similar mathematical logic when you go grocery shopping? "well yes its 56$, but if you add yhem like this, its only 13$!"
Thats not how things work dont care about this thread, just pointing out flawed logic.edit on 15-5-2013 by Strawberry88 because: (no reason given)