It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
There are those of you who probably do not realize exactly how censored your news is. I suggest you read the following to find out. Yes, they absolutely WILL try to hide a nuclear blast, provided Israel did it and the target was Arabs.
"The real issue at hand now is that Israel has proven itself out in the open, under documented irrefutable conditions, that it considers nuclear aggression acceptable policy. This means that for as long as Israel exists it is a menace to the world. It is fairly well proven that Israel caused the Indonesian tsunami, nuked Bali, caused the Japan tsunami, nuked F
UPDATE : IT IS OFFICIAL
My analysis of the nuke in Syria is now proven to be 100 percent accurate.
At first I thought PressTV was compromised and therefore not reporting this. But now, after PressTV went to the scene and spoke to top weapons experts who were also at the scene of the nuclear bombing in Syria, ALL CONCUR: There is no doubt nuclear weapons were used, including at least one ground penetrating nuke, and that proof of the use of nuclear weapons is irrefutable.
The following is quoted from PressTV:
Striking evidence of the use of American EPW (Earth Penetrating Weapons) nuclear weapons in Syria has come to light. Experts say the proof is irrefutable.
This dramatic video footage from Syria has revealed startling evidence that counters Israel’s claims of “surgical strikes” on weapons headed to Lebanon.
What were said to be air strikes is now proven to have actually been artillery, something easily discernible to even an untrained observer.
What happens next is shocking. While artillery shells rain down on Syrian army positions, mobile Israeli artillery in direct support and even accompanying rebel forces inside Syria, a huge explosion occurs.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by Aninonymous
This guy is an idiot to put it mildly. Israel nuked Fukushima? Must have missed that event. His claims are laughable at best. If EMP is non-existent then what happened to all the streetlights in Hawaii after the Starfish Prime high altitude nuclear test? Lights 900 miles away blew out, and breakers were tripped. I guess that was completely unrelated, even though they happened immediately after the detonation?
The weapon in Syria was non-nuclear. Some weapons can have a mushroom cloud, and similar blast effect appearances to nuclear weapons, but if that was a nuke, there would be radiation evidence, as well as seismic evidence. Seismographs record a very different signature for nuclear weapons than for earthquakes, and if the right person reads them, you can even get an idea for the size of the blast. They would detect it a long way away from the blast too. When North Korea had their last nuclear test, it was picked up in Indiana on their seismographs.
Originally posted by Misbah
The reason it looks like a nuclear strike is because it forms a mushroom cloud after explosion. But, the reason it is not a nuclear explosion is because there were enough explosives on the ground to cause such a cloud. And a nuclear explosion doesn't last that short, it would last very much longer, the strike would have been much more clear after and the Syrian government would definitely have given notice about it. The blast ratio would have been greater and the aftermath a lot harsher.
The fire must of reached a big supply of ammunition somewhere and started the explosion of the whole supply all at once. But I find it very awkward that it formed a mushroom cloud and it was so devastating. But Assad has enough weapons to form such clouds so it's highly possible, with a few SCUDs?