reply to post by Signals
I hope you're right Boncho...
I want to trust TPTB,
Trusting anyone is about the dumbest thing you can do in life. You can trust them to be complete idiots, incompetent, useless, or just chug along
acting the way they do.
The closest you would have gotten to a "false flag" in the last 20 years was 9/11. And you know, the writing is all on the way. The 9/11 commission
itself if you actually read it talks about how much BS is in there. The CIA reports that were redacted beyond all reasonable understanding, is
evidence of outright lies to go to war with Iraq.
Can you call 9.11 a false flag? No. Because there is no evidence to suggest that the people involved were solely trained and directed by rogue units
in the intelligence community. Is there a million questions unanswered? Yes!
Are there indications that if the events were actually something that members in the government knew about in planning, they facilitated or even
possibly aided the events to take their natural course, I personally, would say yes but don't hold me to it because I don't have all the data laying
around to back it up. I mean, someone could have spent all that time doing some worthwhile research and put together something of interest. Instead,
most of the 9.11 truth campaigns were about laser beams and thermite, microwaves and Osama Bin Actors.
You wonder where the Iron Man 3 writers got their inspiration, go back and watch the Truther videos that popped up a couple years after 9.11
I can't remember what docu it was that showed the redactions in CIA briefings for Iraq, but I'm still surprised that never turned into something
bigger. Surprised people weren't put on the gallows, to be honest. I mean, there were things like:
"From a trusted source, a member of Saddam Hussein's elite guard, that we paid 1 million dollars to, he found that Saddam has been hiding many
different types of woman in his secret homes guarded by the military, or "sex compounds" as some people call them, and nothing could be considered
"Weapons of mass destruction" but, one could say that the amount of lubricant in there, would equal a decent amount of chemicals if they were chemical
agents used for mass murder. Fortunately they are just KY Jelly supplies. Stocked for his weekends when meeting with secret, undercover liaisons wit
his mistresses. Beyond that, our source has no more information on weapons of mass destruction but believes if we give him another million dollars,
finding the WMDs will be imminent."
So, something like that, gets turned into:
"From a trusted source, a member of Saddam Hussein's elite guard, that ███████████████████████▌, he
found that Saddam has been hiding many different types ███████████████████ secret ████████
guarded by the military, ████████████████▌as███████████████people call them,
██████████████▌ ████████████████████considered "Weapons of mass destruction"
███████████████▌ say that the amount of ████████████████▌, ████████
chemical agents used for mass murder. ████████ they are ████▌████████▌supplies. Stocked
████▌weekends when meeting with secret, undercover liaisons████▌his ████████▌. Beyond that, our source
████▌ more information on weapons of mass destruction ████████▌████▌████████▌ million
████████▌, finding the WMDs will be imminent."
And that was that. I mean, obviously I'm joking, but the redactions were that bad. They were showing absolutely nothing, and redacted to make it look
like something was there.
The country went to war on it for Christs sake.
But again, even that, even a trillion dollar war/boondoggle... A fake play on the world stage. That cost a couple million Iraqis their lives. Barely
any soldiers comparatively. The aim was not to kill or hurt US citizens. It was to start a war and get in there.
Whether or not there was any involvement in 9.11, it was what came after that was the real mess.
And still, with all this, with all the evidence out there... Nothing is pointing to a false flag. And, should you even finally, without a doubt, prove
beyond the shadows that there were 1 or 2 or maybe 10 people that aided 9.11 along so the Iraq campaign could happen, it does not prove widespread
complacency in the government itself. And sure as hell not the types of numbers people are claiming in an event like Boston (Hundreds being "In on
it!") which is ludicrous.
Even the most conservative "false flag" perpetuators, are crafting up schemes in their head, where they think "oh only so and so, and this person,
maybe only 20 people had to be in on it..."
But when you analyze it, the number is way higher.
So.. You have 9.11, which ultimately led to Iraq. Iraq is motive. It is still hard to show anything there... But you think scraping some articles that
are completely unrelated to anything is going to prove a false flag? No...
edit on 14-5-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)