Originally posted by luciddream
The hypocrisy here is... people claim Bush admin is over, but there were no fuss when he killed 1,000s and 1,000 for BS reasons, and gets of scott
free but Obama does something, "omg, impeach him!!"
So you are saying because Bush wasn't impeached for something that you felt he should have been - that we should ignore anything and everything
illegal that Obama does to be fair.
Ok, lets say a person who bullied you in school murdered someone and got off on a technicality. Then a dear friend of yours murders someone. Your
friend should be set free because your enemy was let free for murder?
That seems to be your rationalization.
Oh, maybe you are saying - Heh, it was only 4 people for Obama, once he gets to 1000 people dead then he can be investigated but not until the level
of his murder reaches the level of Bush'es murder.
No, I got that wrong - You are saying since according to you Bush murdered 1000's, and in this instance Obama only murdered 4 people that Obama's
crime doesn't count.
Oops, I'm trying hard to understand your reasoning here.
Ok, Obama is responsible for the murder of 4 people we know of in Benghazi by omission if nothing else, the thousands of troops killed in Iraq and
Afghanistan since he took office don't count, their deaths are Bush's fault not Obama's even though he could have brought them home if he wanted to;
and you feel Bush is responsible for the murder of thousands that do count in your eyes, so we should look the other way when it comes to Obama's
paltry 4 murders??
Oh, dear, you need to straighten me out without using the words, Democrat, Republican, and conspiracy theorists, and right wing etc.
PS Got to run an errand, not abandoning the thread, can't wait to see your reply later! Toodles
edit on 13-5-2013 by grandmakdw because: PS