posted on May, 13 2013 @ 09:32 AM
6 popes and unknown number of cardinals didn't tell us the truth. What happened in Fatima 1917? If we accept it was the real Our Lady, what She
Many devote people just cannot go out of the so set paradigm. They cannot contemplate scenario where they are already deluded from the beginning. They
do not notice the simple fact that the First and Second secrets are NOT ANNOUNCED IN 1917 in the field by the 3 children! Not like modern apparitions
where the seer dictates under the camera! It didn't happen in Fatima at all! NO SECRETS WERE ANNOUNCED TO THE MULTITUDE THAT SAW THE SUN MIRACLE! The
1st and 2nd secrets are written down in 1941 by Lucy and sent to the pope in a sealed envelope. At least that is what we are told (pls refer to
sources of Fatima like fatima.org or others, internet is full of them). The texts released in 1941 known as 1st and 2nd secrets are texts that passed
the utmost scrutiny of the Vatican, in a hierarchy stricktly set in centuries old rules (and who knows what more) before the Second Vatican Council.
We must notice the fact 1941 is already the time when WW2 is in full mode on the Western front, France is captured as well as the rest of Western
Europe by Hitler. In June 1941 Hitler invaded the Soviet Union. In such unfortunate circumstances of unimaginable mechanized military at that time and
falling country after country, the Vatican releases the secrets that point out the finger to Russia (then Soviet Union).
The possibility to politicize the message of the biggest apparition in 20th century, published only after the events happened and not before them, is
far greater than the humble believers could accept or even imagine.
There are already precedents of changed messages allegedly coming from Heaven. For ex. bl. Elena Aiello's prophecies have at least 2 versions both
available online. In one of them the priests' immorality is strongly criticized, and in the other they are praised and encouraged to be example of
morality...(sorry I cannot present all the links, pls just googe them).
Even if everything said about Fatima secrets 1 and 2 is presented to the public exactly as it was given by Our Lady, still remains the enigma of the
so called Third Secret. The vision of martyrdom offered in 2000 as the "official secret" is not a part of the text released as 1st and 2nd secret.
It is a vision of Lucy not message of Our Lady. (other interpretations exist that it is totally fabricated, but let say it is a true vision and is
published as it is). The devote researcher knows well that the 3rd secret should be a part of the same text as 1st and 2nd and is a part of that
message not a separate vision.
We still don't know the real Fatima. The suggestions it is WW3 started by Russia, (or averted after the so called consecration), or planetary
cataclysm, or antichrist in hi ranks, are just what they are - suggestions. Why not involvement of extraterrestrials, good and/or bad? It is really
something revolutionary in the christian thought and worth of the biggest apparition of the 20th bloodiest century. The speculation, prognosis and
best guesses (or not so best) will continue until the moment when the public will finally be presented with the authentic texts.
The situation with the so called 3rd secret, half revealed, half concealed or even brutally changed and fabricated (I don't know which is true) makes
uncertain the 1st and 2nd secret as well. Because we stumble upon the same kind of reasons that hided the 3rd. Or much worse. In 1941 there wasn't
Vatican 2 to allow many things the faithful today enjoy to do. Especially in the realm of the supernatural. Imprimatur was required for everything
printed, and so on. The elderly faithful today may be unhappy with some of the results of Vatican 2 but let they remember the censored books for ex.
in the time before (or ask somebody, or read about it). Let not go further back in time, because the more we go the worse the picture is. Instead of
blaming Vatican 2 let ask for Vatican 3.
Let me repeat again, on the day of Fatima 96 y after the first apparition: the uncertainty only grows, for me to the extend to doubt the already
existing texts or requirements for consecration of Russia. If so, why didn't they do it? May be OL never asked it, or may be there is a completely
different text about Russia. The questions and speculations only will rise if the mode of JPII is followed - say about millions dead from one moment
to another, say it is not necessary for the faithful to know it ?!? and then release a fabricated vision saying it is already fulfilled. Quite naive,
unsatisfactory, petty. It puts the intelligence of the faithful to test. It humiliates them, asking them to believe authority instead of the truth. it
speaks of the authority itself.
Notice that none of the above is ex cathedra or dogma. I may not believe a line of Fatima and that is not required for my salvation. As the things go,
I will reach the point not to believe a line. Because I refuse to believe a lie. And I have no criteria to discern when the lie is offered together
mixed with the truth.