On rhuminating over the recent reports and videos of police using far more force than anything that would be reasonably and normally required to
subdue people.i have made some tentative conclusions.....
Despite the distinct possibility of sub plots running simultaneously, the training of the forces reactions to
situational variety is distinctly lacking in its scope to handle the far more subtle nuances of police work in our society.
The escalation to violence is a trained and programmed instinct which the police forces find easy to instill in their recruits.
Witnessing this from outside seems to reveal that the police are in general too quick to apply a violent
reaction or solution to situational events.even to ones that are non treatening or minimally threatening to anyone.
Whatever sub influence that is altering the police perception of themselves,is the hidden basis of the visible violent outbursts which the police have
enacted with what seems an ever increasing frequency.
Training our officers to react to situational variables requires that an overall intelligence quotient of recruits must be held to higher
The psychological profile to which the officer is trained...is itself a flawed construct.
This is no accident....it simply cheaper to hire and train no minds to do the drudgery of the field work,
and train specialists to do the science.
Though the picture i paint is oversimplefied for illustrative purposes...
The real situation is far less obvious and some advance from the ranks to the offices downtown....
What we end up with are the officers who are trainable to a degree, but are actually the shock troops.....
Who are simply trained to meet resistance with violence, and to brook no resistance.
Anybody who has watched the police handle confrontations can tell you that the ecalation of violence is swift and overwhelming should one try to
peacefully resist...let alone dare struggle with an officer.
This is the result of the training which they are subject to, as well as the psych profile(they choose bullies)
which is the preffered recruiting material.
As the police become increasingly militarised, with their Mrap armoured cars, their sub machine guns and swat gear, their real assault rifles,and
given greater powers....Like patriot act powers etc...the need to train them in the subtelties of people management seems to have given over to the
simple overwhelming application of violent force to most situations.
The result is a less versitile, and mentally less able person whose entrenched instinctual reaction is to apply instant and overwhelming force to any
given difficulty he or she may encounter.
Is this the profile of the kind of officers we want to be policing our streets?
My contention in a nut shell then, is this
They are picking the wrong people to recruit for polce work.....the profile they pefer is flawed.
They are training these recruits to react with far too much emphasis on a violent response.
And furthermore react with deadly force.
This type of traning is emphasized while more subtle ploys could easily be equally successful.
The upshot is we end up playing out miniature WACO scenes....all over the country.
And we are being conditoned to accept it. us v them they win hands down and dont forget it!
The possibility of a large scale social conditioning effort should not be ruled out.
In effect the people.,you, and i, are being played in this psycho drama which goes nowhere but further down the road to total control.
And is is obvious that one day soon we will not be allowed to even ask questions.without a skull cracking by the local gendarmes.
Personally i find the psychological scope of what is tranpiring in our society is beyond doubt being manipulaed daily by programmers whose knowledge
of human behavoir belittles that of outside science.
I cant help but cringe at the evidence i see around me of social engineering and mind control and manipulation on vast scales.
And somehow i have to wonder if somehow, the violence that all too often is turned on us by police,
isnt just another angle to the changes occuring across the board in western democracies.
and if so whos driving?
edit on 12-5-2013 by stirling because: (no reason given)