It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
I postulate the idea that Ats is the prototype original web conspiracy debunking experiment. This idea itself of course is a conspiracy theory, and certainly not unique i have seen several threads bring this idea forward in different manners to try and pry open the shrouded veil.
This thread has its own unique angle to attempt to lift the veil by discussing what debundking techniques are being used to influence Atsers conspiracy views, to control them into ineffectiveness and submission?
Oh, please. Not another "everyone who disagrees with me is a shill" thread.
No, it's not a unique angle. The debunking techniques used by us CIA agent shills involve "logic" and "reason". Sometimes "knowledge" or "understanding of a topic". A good conspiracy is fun, one that involves magic, incredible logistic issues for no gain, or obvious logical gaps is so rare.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
I notice when you post on Ats you usually have a debunking argument against. You have just provided the first example of a debunk technique, denouncing something as nothing new... using the " oh please' intro. Thanks for your input the first example, as an example from a core Ats thread debunker.
I hope to get more debunker posts, i want to catalogue as many there response debunk techniques as possible.
It IS nothing new. You are usually on there accusing people of being shills, as well.
Muster up a good argument, you'll have fewer "shills" asking about the holes in your theory.
I postulate the idea that Ats is the prototype original web conspiracy debunking experiment.
This thread has its own unique angle to attempt to lift the veil by discussing what debundking techniques are being used to influence Atsers conspiracy views, to control them into ineffectiveness and submission?
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
Have you considered for one moment mabey i deliberately added the word unique as a pysological "Bait" trigger.
Oh, please. Not another "everyone who disagrees with me is a shill" thread.
Muster up a good argument, you'll have fewer "shills" asking about the holes in your theory
It's an intellectually bankrupt argument most ATS shill-claimers use to defend their claim when it's not defensible by reason.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
There are shills on Ats for sure.edit on 10-5-2013 by AthlonSavage because: (no reason given)
As i explain in my OP i am interested in hearing about the debunking techiques used.
As for the "Protyope" theory itself, i dont have any direct evidence, and not even saying i am in complete agreement with the theory.
Some people enjoy debunking ideas, and motives may range from professional debunker to a person who simply and genuinely doesnt believe in a conspiracy theory idea.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
Im glad Bedlam you decided to post in my thread, as you provide great examples of the techniques Im looking for to highlight in this thread. The quotes above are from your posts so far:
The techiques i see are
- Creates the idea that i will consider posters a Shill if they disagree with me
- Then uses reverse pyscological logic that saying if i moderate my thread with arguments he finds acceptable, the less shilling will come my way
- When finding his shilling is not working, starts throwing in the intellectually bankrupt argument
Originally posted by GENERAL EYES
I won't see them as shills so much as "agent provocateurs"...they provoke and poke and ridicule and do their best to play alpha dog in order to win "The Game"...the game they made up just to "win" against an imaginary "foe".