It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96
Obama: We have a moral obligation to end the slaughter and ensure a stable Syria
NO
WE
DON'T
We have a moral obligation to respect a country's sovereignty and to provide humanitarian aid to the refugees who have suffered.
THAT'S IT!
We have a moral obligation to respect a country's sovereignty and to provide humanitarian aid to the refugees who have suffered.
What about our moral obligation to protect the Christians being slaughtered in Egypt????
reply to post by neo96
It would also be moral to stay the hell out of Syria, and let them sort their own crap out. So what national security interest is being met arming Al Qaeda ?
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by beezzer
We have a moral obligation to respect a country's sovereignty and to provide humanitarian aid to the refugees who have suffered.
I thought that was what the UN was for?
I have problems 'providing humanitarian aid' too.
Saw what that got us in Somalia,what it got us in other parts of the ME.
May sound cruel to some, but hey,' let's make sure people who hate,and want to kill, have all the food, and medicine they want'.
No thanks.edit on 9-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheWrightWing
The hell we do.
That Obama is dependably wrong about everything.