posted on May, 9 2013 @ 03:30 PM
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
I call them terrorists because they affiliate themselves with terrorists. They act like terrorists in the free and indiscriminate murder of civilians
while also drawing fire upon those same civilians by fighting amongst them.
They release videos of themselves blowing Syrian POW's to bloody pieces, on the growing, screaming for their lives (Syrian military is made up of
conscripts, not "True Believers". That was outright murder...and they laughed and joked about it on the video THEY released of themselves).
They then kill animals in testing of bath tub chemical weapons and release videos of that, as well. Here most recently, they kidnap UN workers ..for
the second time in separate incidents and parade their photos as prisoners...not the people they claim to have 'simply assisted out of harm's
Add to all this, they've willingly and openly sided with Al Qaeda in Iraq and AQI has mutually joined THEM. How precisely wouldn't you call those
scum, terrorists? If not them, who? What definition would fit?
These people we now support, fund and are about to openly start arming...are doing EVERYTHING we have viciously condemned and gone to actual WAR over
(Taliban, Nov-Dec 2001), in other nations already. The fact they have care packages with little American flags instead of the black flags of Al Qaeda
doesn't change what they are .....and for that matter, it isn't at all unknown for them to be seen waving the black flags of that who organization
openly and proudly as well.
We agree on much...but as someone who HAS literally been watching this since the "Peaceful Protests" in Homs began, secondary to calls across Arab
sites and the People's Liberation Front web properties to 'Join the Syrian Uprising and bring the Arab Spring to Damascus"? I can think of NO other
proper term for these animals. So.. We sure can't agree on everything, indeed.
We should BOMB them...not fund them.