posted on May, 10 2013 @ 08:25 AM
Originally posted by Forests
Originally posted by bbracken677
I fail to understand the connection between a submerged island and a very advanced civilization.
They were smart enough to get off.
P.S. and I don't mean get off like you're thinking either.
What leads one from A (submerged island) to B (existence of a very advanced civilization)?
My point was that just because an island once existed that is now submerged, without any other evidence whatsoever, does not, in any rational line of
thinking, lead one to conjecture an advanced civilization.
Thats like saying: Since Bob watered his lawn in California, Sue bought groceries in Ottawa. Bob and Sue do not know each other.
There is no connection whatsoever. There are no dots to connect. There is no rational reason one would connect submerged island with advanced
Now if there were also archaeological finds on this submerged island, then you might have something to grasp at, but as is: (island therefore
civilization) there is absolutely nothing. Nada, zippo, nuttin'
I mean really...there is no connection whatsoever with: island = man....no evidence man was on the island, no evidence that homo anything existed on
the island or even at whatever time the island was above sea level.