NEW INFO: Amb. Stevens Was Taken to Hospital Under Enemy Control

NEW INFO: Amb. Stevens Was Taken to Hospital Under Enemy Control Read more: foxnewsinsider.com...

foxnewsinsider.com

In a new revelation that former UN Ambassador John Bolton called "stunning," one of the Benghazi whistleblowers said that the body of Ambassador Chris Stevens was brought to a hospital under the control of terror group Ansar al-Shariah, which was later blamed for the attack on the U.S. Consulate. He said that there were discussions at one point on whether a team needed to be assembled to rescue Stevens from the hospital.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Other articles:
townhall.com... n1591031

Watching the hearings now...LIVE...and I find them to be both emotional and revealing.
Hicks also said they were concerned that since they believed the hospital was under terrorist control, that they may have been being set up for an ambush, should they rush to retrieve him.

This adds further weight and proof to the argument that it was not only known that this was a terrorist attack from the get-go, but that the Al Qaeda-linked group Ansar al-Shariah was directly responsible for the "attack".

foxnewsinsider.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Hicks: Ansar al-Sharia Attempted to Bait Rescue Team Into Ambush

Hicks claimed this was most likely Ansar al-Sharia attempting to bait the rescue team into a trap:

GREGORY HICKS: [...] After the announcement of Chris’s passing military escort and vehicles arrived at the airport. So the decision was made for them to go to the annex. one of the, before I got the call from the prime minister we had received several phone calls on the phone that had been with the ambassador saying that we know where the ambassador is. Please, you can come get him. And our local staff engaged on those phone calls admirably. Asking very, very good, outstanding even open-ended questions about where was he? Trying to discern whether he was alive, whether they even had the ambassador, whether that person was with the ambassador. Send a picture. Could we talk to the ambassador? Because we knew separately from David that the ambassador was in a hospital. That we believe was under Ansar al-Sharia’s call. We suspected we were being baited into a trap and so we did not want to go send our people into an ambush. And we didn’t. We sent them to the annex. [...]

freebeacon.com...

Seriously...Could it not be more clear to anyone...regardless of politics...that DURING the attack, that those on the ground in Benghazi...knew, not only that this WAS a terrorist attack, but that they ALSO knew exactly WHICH al-qaeda- associated terror group was responsible...AT THE TIME?!

No wonder the survivors have been silenced, hidden from congress and intimidated by the administration.

I'm confused by this whole situation.

Why is it that foreign terrorism is being played down, while domestic terrorism is the big thing?

This situation was clearly mishandled, but to what end? In a climate where it seems like the media and government wants everyone to be terrified, what good was it to hide this? What was the goal?

One other observation from the hearings...Hicks, in his statements appears to be going out of his way in listing specific full names of people who were working there with him at the consulate during the attack. THESE people would be many of the survivors whose names had been withheld from congress and the media by the administration.

Getting these new names could open the door to getting more survivor-whistle blower testimony.

Originally posted by TheBlackTiger
I'm confused by this whole situation.

Why is it that foreign terrorism is being played down, while domestic terrorism is the big thing?

This situation was clearly mishandled, but to what end? In a climate where it seems like the media and government wants everyone to be terrified, what good was it to hide this? What was the goal?

Correction:
According to the administration...only NON-ISLAMIC domestic terrorism is the big thing.

Originally posted by IAMTAT
Hicks also said they were concerned that since they believed the hospital was under terrorist control, that they may have been being set up for an ambush, should they rush to retrieve him.

You are omitting a HUGE portion of the story which is after the initial attack (and the rumored assault on Ambassador Stevens' person) and en route to the hospital, they treated Chris Stevens body like a rag doll and even posed for photos with him (since the area outside the consulate was under terrorist control):




By many accounts, Ambassador Stevens was deceased prior to arrival at this hospital under terrorist control....

reply to post by NickDC202


Maybe they didn't know he was already dead before he arrived at the hospital?

Remember those awful photos (warning: graphic photos) of the body of Ambassador Stevens being dragged through the streets of Benghazi?:





Remember what Obama said about those photos?:

Obama claimed that the Libyan security forces "fought back against the attackers." He also claimed that Libyan civilians attempted to aid Ambassador Stevens by transporting him to the hospital: Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

www.breitbart.com...

I think this new information points out yet another disturbing and false narrative coming from Obama and Clinton.
Stevens was being taken BY terrorists...to a terrorist-controlled hospital...as part of a planned ambush for Americans told to come and get him.

Originally posted by TheBlackTiger
I'm confused by this whole situation.

Why is it that foreign terrorism is being played down, while domestic terrorism is the big thing?

This situation was clearly mishandled, but to what end? In a climate where it seems like the media and government wants everyone to be terrified, what good was it to hide this? What was the goal?

Why are you confused? The American government is rogue, tyrannical and elements of it have committed treason against the American people and the Constitution. Foreign terrorism is easy to play down, you just tell the MSM to not cover it, it's in the criminal governments best interest to play down so that they can kill innocent civilians in broad sweeping drone strikes without getting the zombie liberal followers and their false sense of morality and underwear in a bunch, then they are also free to pillage and steal resources while restructuring currency value and installing a central bank.

Domestic terrorism is all that is reported, hyped and over inflated because then they can use it to help silence what they are doing over seas and justify laws to surveil, spy on and violate our rights so that we can't discuss or know what they are really doing. It's criminal, it's anti-American and it's not legitimate politics. What it is is an active war on the people of the United States waged by our own government.

The time to realize this and restore the Republic is now, it is coming and coming fast.

reply to post by IAMTAT


If you look at my post history about the savages who US officials claimed were trying to save Ambassador Stevens, I am somewhat sad to say that I was spot-on in my analysis of this act of terror.... the reason I am somewhat sad that I was correct is that as someone with a degree in political science and journalism, the fabrications that were presented as truth in the "official" story were way too obviously untrue to anyone with a similar education and a keen knowledge of geopolitical affairs...

Originally posted by NickDC202
reply to post by IAMTAT

 

If you look at my post history about the savages who US officials claimed were trying to save Ambassador Stevens, I am somewhat sad to say that I was spot-on in my analysis of this act of terror.... the reason I am somewhat sad that I was correct is that as someone with a degree in political science and journalism, the fabrications that were presented as truth in the "official" story were way too obviously untrue to anyone with a similar education and a keen knowledge of geopolitical affairs...

Very true yet what would you wager the chances are that anyone is convicted of a crime and pays the price that should be paid for this outrage? This administration stonewalled Congress in Fast and Furious and has even featured Holder lecturing others about gun violence and also the ultimate kick in the teeth, Obama telling Mexicans in Mexico, Americans are responsible for their gun troubles.

Where and when does the ignorance and madness stop and arrests and convictions start. Too many are waiting and impatiently is putting it rather mild.

Originally posted by TheBlackTiger
I'm confused by this whole situation.

Why is it that foreign terrorism is being played down, while domestic terrorism is the big thing?

Sadly, it comes down to a simple reason: election cycle politics.

If the facts of the 11 September 2012 attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, which resulted in the first US Ambassador murdered in the line of duty since 1979, came to light in September 2012 there was the potential that such information would dramatically alter the focus, tone and possibly the outcome of the 2012 US Presidential election.

The terror incident in Benghazi and the lies utilized to curtail focus on the incident could have raised serious questions in the closing weeks of the campaign.

While personally I doubt that the final outcome would have changed, it certainly is possible that it could have depending on how things played out if the truth about Benghazi came to light in September 2012.

FYI: Feel free to add Benghazi to the long list of lies the government and media told the public to further the needs/wants of the government itself....

maybe this has something to with it

U.S. State Dept FUNDED & TRAINED Benghazi Terrorist, Ansar al Sharia
..."You want to know what bothered me so much about being assigned in Libya? It's not the hardships, it's not the gunfire, it's not the threats. It's dealing & fighting against the people, the programs & the personnel who were supposed to be supporting me. And I added to it by saying, 'Jim (Bacigalupo) for me, it's as if the Taliban is on the inside of the building."...

conservativereport.org...
Can't have the peeps getting MORE wind of who the terrorist actually are and who they actually work for

Originally posted by Helious
Very true yet what would you wager the chances are that anyone is convicted of a crime and pays the price that should be paid for this outrage? This administration stonewalled Congress in Fast and Furious and has even featured Holder lecturing others about gun violence and also the ultimate kick in the teeth, Obama telling Mexicans in Mexico, Americans are responsible for their gun troubles.

Helious think of the countless mouth breathing rubes who, even with the documentation of facts which explicit lay out a conspiracy of lies by the US Government in both Fast & Furious and Benghazi, still believe the government wouldn't lie to them or be part of any shenanigans which harm innocent civilians...

To quote the great Bill Hicks:
“Go back to bed, America. Your government has figured out how it all transpired. Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control again. Here. Here's American Gladiators. Watch this, shut up. Go back to bed, America. Here is American Gladiators. Here is 56 channels of it! Watch these pituitary retards bang their #ing skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom. Here you go, America! You are free to do what we tell you! You are free to do what we tell you!”

More that Clinton knew...and lied!

Whistleblower Gregory Hicks briefed Sec State Clinton at 2AM on Benghazi terror attacks

According to testimony today, Hicks claims that shortly after that phone call, at 2AM Benghazi time, he briefed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Hicks says that during the briefing, he referred to the incident as a terrorist attack, and that at no time was it referred to as anything else.

He also updated her on the search for Ambassador Stevens who was then still missing and believed to be in a terrorist-controlled hospital. So, that night, while Chris Stevens was still MIA, Hillary had already been informed that the attack on the compound was terrorist oriented.

canadafreepress.com...

Up until today, i had not been privvy to the photos of Amb. Stevens being dragged through the streets like that.

The last time i saw anything remenicent was in 1993, in Mogadishu.

The blood of this man is on Obamas hands and will be forever.

These people were left to die even allowed to die.

"Four Americans, four patriots, they loved their country and chose to serve it and serve it well," Obama said. "They had a mission and they believed in it, and they knew the danger and they accepted it. They didn't simply embrace the American ideal, they lived it, they embodied it: the courage, the hope and, yes, the idealism."

Yes Obama...Four Americans, Four patriots....you killed them..

Originally posted by Rulkiewicz
reply to post by NickDC202

 

Maybe they didn't know he was already dead before he arrived at the hospital?

It's possible, but not probable... If we compare the treatment of Ambassador Stevens to a prominent Libyan, Muammar Gaddafi; sure, when I saw the video of Gaddafi being dragged around like a violent Weekend at Bernie's, sure there were points that I thought he was still alive but I wasn't there. In many ways the "hospital management" is a moot point because it is being alleged those dragging the Ambassador's corpse through the road and those controlling the hospital were playing for the same team.

reply to post by andy1972


OFF TOPIC: Your mention of Mogadishu reminds me of someone I never met but who impacted my life in so many positive ways: Dan Eldon was a 22 year old photojournalist, artist and activist who, along with three colleagues, was stoned to death by an angry mob in Mogadishu in an incident before the Battle of Mogadishu (1993). Eldon's posthumous work "The Journey is the Destination" is a book I highly recommend.