It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You've had a lot of your physics more or less right so far but I think you missed this one. If the photon lost energy it would in effect be red-shifted. I'm not familiar with that specific mirror setup but in general the way mirrors work is the energy lost is a fraction of the photons get absorbed in the mirror, but the ones that don't get absorbed usually don't lose energy:
Originally posted by dragonridr
what they mean is a mirror doesnt actually have a photon bounce off it. What happens when a photon hits a mirror is its absorbed by the mirror and then a new photon is created and off it goes. But the act of creating that new photon means each time theres a little less energy until eventually there isnt enough for the mirror to make a new one. We can go into detail if you want but thats basically whats going on.
In a quantum-mechanical picture, light consists of photons, or packages of optical energy. The photons of the light reflected from a metal (or a dielectric mirror) are identical to the incident ones, apart from the changed propagation direction. The loss of light in the metal means that some fraction of the photons are lost, while the energy content of each reflected photon is fully preserved. Which of the photons are lost is a matter of chance; there is a certain probability for each photon to be absorbed.
World's Largest Quantum Bell Test Spans Three Swiss Towns
In their experiment, the physicists sent pairs of entangled photons from Geneva through optical fibers leading to interferometers in two other Swiss towns: Satigny and Jussy, located 8.2 and 10.7 km away, respectively. The distance between the interferometers in Satigny and Jussy was 18 km.
With this large distance between the interferometers, the physicists could perform a more complete quantum measurement than has previously been done. Somewhat surprisingly, physicists have never decided exactly when a quantum measurement is finished (when the “collapse” occurs, if there is any).
Different interpretations of quantum mechanics lead to different answers. The most common view is that a quantum measurement is finished as soon as the photons are absorbed by detectors. Previous experiments have been set up to allow enough distance between particle detectors to prohibit communication under this view. But there are also other views of when the measurement is finished, including “when the result is secured in a classical system,” “when the information is in the environment,” or even that it is never over – a view that leads to the many worlds interpretation.
The Swiss team followed a view proposed independently by Penrose and Diosi, which assumes a connection between quantum measurements and gravity, and requires a macroscopic mass to be moved. In this view, the measurement takes more time than it does for a photon to be absorbed by a detector. The significance of the Swiss test is that it is the first “space-like separated” Bell test under the Penrose-Diosi assumption.
In the physicists’ experiment, the detection of each photon by a single-photon detector triggers a voltage to a piezoelectric actuator. The actuator expands, which in turn causes a tiny gold-surfaced mirror to move. By measuring the mirror displacement, the researchers could confirm by the gravity-quantum connection that the quantum measurement had been successfully finished.
All of the steps – from photon detection to mirror movement – take about 7.1 microseconds, which is significantly less than the 60 microseconds it would take a photon to cover the 18 km between interferometers. So measurements made simultaneously at each of the interferometers could not be been influenced by anything traveling at – or even a few times more than – the speed of light.
In your idea Bob could somehow know which photons in the pairs Alice had observed and which she hadn't observed. But this actuator will move when each photon strikes it whether the entangled partner at the other end was observed at the other end or not. So it doesn't support your magical detector claim in any way, and in no way leads to any FTL communication nor does it claim to.
Originally posted by neoholographic
This is from 2008 and this is exactly what I've been saying. Information isn't traveling from point A to point B. So detection and measurement take 7.1 microseconds. Again:
THE DETECTION OF EACH PHOTON TRIGGERS A VOLTAGE TO AN ACTUATOR WHICH CAUSE A MIRROR TO MOVE AND THIS TAKES 7.1 MICROSECONDS.
In this case you don't have to check for correlations because you're not trying to prove entanglement. You have detected Alice's particle pair.
Originally posted by neoholographic
reply to post by dragonridr
Again, the same nonsense. All of this stems because some of you guys will not take the time to learn how entanglement works. Entanglement works because you can detect when entangled particle is measured.
Let me guess...you're skeptical about the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior? Yeah, I am too, which is why I'm usually critical of those videos too and in fact I made a thread to not only criticize one of the clips from that movie, but to put its misrepresentation of the observer effect in perspective:
Originally posted by yampa
Those Dr Quantum videos on youtube are absolute poison, btw. Very misleading about the state of material reality.
But even with these clever measurement schemes, none have yielded FTL communication, so far.
in quantum mechanics, which deals with very small objects, it is not possible to observe a system without changing the system
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Let me guess...you're skeptical about the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior? Yeah, I am too, which is why I'm usually critical of those videos too and in fact I made a thread to not only criticize one of the clips from that movie, but to put its misrepresentation of the observer effect in perspective:
Originally posted by yampa
Those Dr Quantum videos on youtube are absolute poison, btw. Very misleading about the state of material reality.
The "observer effect": Is it proof the system is "aware it's being observed?"
However, as many problems as there are with many ridiculous claims in that movie, there is some real science mixed in and the particular clip neoholographic posted earlier didn't contain any huge discrepancies with observation and experiment that I recall. If it had, I think I would have complained about it.
I didn't really get into entanglement in my thread, but the observer effect is at the heart of why neoholographic's idea hasn't been done. There have been some clever attempts to get around the observer effect in quantum entanglement experiments, which is simply stated:
Observer effect (physics)
But even with these clever measurement schemes, none have yielded FTL communication, so far.
in quantum mechanics, which deals with very small objects, it is not possible to observe a system without changing the system
So I think what I uncovered was an "observer effect" that the fatter probe has so much metal mass to it, that it actually acts like a heat sink and actually changes the temperature of what it's measuring
What Einstein's E=mc2 is to relativity theory, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is to quantum mechanics—not just a profound insight, but also an iconic formula that even non-physicists recognize. The principle holds that we cannot know the present state of the world in full detail, let alone predict the future with absolute precision. It marks a clear break from the classical deterministic view of the universe.
Yet the uncertainty principle comes in two superficially similar formulations that even many practicing physicists tend to confuse. Werner Heisenberg's own version is that in observing the world, we inevitably disturb it. And that is wrong, as a research team at the Vienna University of Technology has now vividly demonstrated.
Originally posted by neoholographic
reply to post by dragonridr
Again, the same nonsense. All of this stems because some of you guys will not take the time to learn how entanglement works. Entanglement works because you can detect when entangled particle is measured.
Originally posted by neoholographic
Again, without DETECTION you don't have entanglement. How can you build a quantum network if you can't detect when network B is making a measurement on the entangled pair at network A? You can't build a quantum communication network if you don't know when entangled particle pairs are being measured.
Again, some of you guys don't understand entanglement.
He says you can't send "net information" and uses morse code as an example.
Originally posted by neoholographic
What Dr. Kaku is talking about is trying to send a morse code via entanglement. Well, you couldn't if you tried to say spin up is a + and spin down is a - .
Kaku referred to sending a love letter FTL saying it can't be done (yet).
Originally posted by neoholographic
Kaku actually supports what I'm saying when he says information can be sent faster than light.
Do you even know what he means when he says "net information"? What is he talking about and how do you define "net information"?
Also, what I described, how is that sending "net information"?
Originally posted by neoholographic
If you had 24 channels on the QCD, you can send text messages to each other faster than light from anywhere in the universe.
There's a lot of semantics going on in the terminology of "information" and "communication", but perhaps the simplest definition would be to say nothing "useful" is received faster than light.
Quantum teleportation, or entanglement-assisted teleportation, is a process by which a qubit (the basic unit of quantum information) can be transmitted exactly (in principle) from one location to another, without the qubit being transmitted through the intervening space. It is useful for quantum information processing. However, it does not immediately transmit classical information, and therefore cannot be used for communication at superluminal (faster than light) speed.
Originally posted by neoholographic
Originally posted by Subterranean13
No, information cannot be transferred faster than light. I know quantum entanglement sounds like it should enable this, but it cannot. Using it, you may be able to know about something so far away, that communicating it at the speed of light would take longer, but simply knowing about something does not necessarily transfer information.
It has been known since the middle ages that light exerts a radiation pressure. Not so well known is that light also exerts a twist.
The intricate nature of this twist was not recognised until the 1990s and we have been working on it ever since. Beyond the fascination of setting microscopic objects into rotation, this orbital angular momentum may hold the key to better communication sensing and imaging systems.
Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM)
The phase fronts of light beams in orbital angular momentum (OAM) eigenstates rotate, clockwise for positive OAM values, anti-clockwise for negative values. The phase front with 0 OAM doesn't rotate at all.