It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I didn't understand your example.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by Arbitrageur
What about like the situation in my reply, involving only one particle?
No, in this thread I've mostly avoided discussing the state we desire the particle to be in and have tried to reply in the context of neoholographic's scenario, that the state is irrelevant, where he called the information a "D" whether it was down/up or up/down.
So your problem is the seemingly impossibility of observing one entangled particle at a time, measuring it in the state you desire it to be in, and then another and another, and having this sequence of measurements represent something on the other side.
The basic setup goes like this:
Both pairs of photons are entangled, so that the two particles in the first set are entangled with each other, and the two particles in the second set are entangled with each other.
Originally posted by neoholographic
In channel one, the only measurement is spin up/spin down or spin down/spin up which = 10. I have been saying this over and over again!
The only information Bob can receive on channel 1 is 10.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by ImaFungi
Let's say Alice observes some entangled particles but not others. Let's say Bob is a million miles away and observes every particle sent to him.
When Alice observed one particle of the entangled pair first, Bob is getting nearly instantaneous information about the state of the particle that Alice observed. But at the time of his observation, he doesn't know which particles Alice observed or didn't observe. Alice has to send him that information at the speed of light or less.
So there is no way his "QCD" can light up telling him he got FTL information from Alice at FTL speeds. He and his QCD have no idea which particles Alice observed, unless they are informed at light speed, or unless it's a pre-arranged plan, say to just measure every single particle, in which case as Alfa1 said he can go golfing because he already knows the message in advance because it was pre-planned.
Please explain in detail how this happens. This is the point that is being missed.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
bobs device will register that his particles entangled pair has been measured by alice.
Using Neoholographics example, I already know the communication:
Originally posted by ImaFungi
So if they were to set prearranged time for bob to check, whats the dealio?
This is the flaw in neoholographics proposal. There is no such thing.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
there would have to be some memory on bobs device, that could be aware when the entangled particles in the device were proded into an exact state
Originally posted by neoholographic
To me this translates as "Bob observes the particle without observing it", or "Bob measures the particle without measuring it". I don't understand the distinction between measurement and observation in your statement.
Originally posted by neoholographic
When Alice measures her particle in her QCD, a measurement in Bob's entangled pair will instantly occur.
Bob doesn't need to observe his particle for a measurement to occur.