It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On Monday afternoon May 6, 2013 live from the Sean Hannity radio show, the man who operated the UAV drone at the time of the Benghazi attacks, a US army technician called the show. According to him there were 6 Army personnel involved in the mission monitoring the attack as it was in process.
This man wondered why the recorded filmed evidence was not subpoenaed by Congress or the State Department. This UAV drone operator, John, as he called himself, testified that there were hundreds of attackers backed by vehicles that were surrounding the US consulate building. He was then ordered to navigate the craft to hover over and observe the CIA annex building just 2 miles away.
This man’s testimony substantiates that he observed a large heavily armed and coordinated attack not a random gathering of protesters who had gotten out of hand as falsely alleged by the Clinton State Department. Apparently in their haste to suppress all direct witnesses to the worst foreign relations disaster in US history, the Obama White House overlooked the Army unit that was flying a drone over the hot zone, who saw the massive attacks that contradict the administration’s claims that protesters had been responsible for the slaughter of US diplomatic personnel as well as the burning of the building.
Will justice finally be served? We will see. In all this, the Obama White House knew immediately that Al Qaeda terrorists were involved, yet lied anyway! In the terrible aftermath, the President went to bed and left the next day for a fundraiser in Las Vegas the following day.
Originally posted by Carreau
reply to post by muse7
Is there any act a democrat could do you wouldn't try to defend or deflect in a thread?
The deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya during a 2012 attack on a diplomatic outpost in Benghazi told investigators he thought it was a terrorist strike from the beginning, according to interview excerpts released Sunday on CBS News’s “Face the Nation.”
Originally posted by MrMaybeNot
I haven't read much on the Benghazi coverup but if I understand correctly, it's a big deal because Obama didn't call it a terrorist attack from the get go to save his campaign? Anyone care to explain me why this is so important?
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
I agree that we should be wary of the caller, but should our Representatives just drop this? Don't ask questions? Does that fit your defense of the ideology? At this point yes, it will be politicized because it needs to be. It is starting to mount that the current Administration tried to sweep it under the rug.
It's almost scary for the depth of what must be here.