It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, in two years time when we're all still here can we dispense with this highly profitable nonsense?
Originally posted by talklikeapirat
reply to post by TheWriterChick
I will be posting lots of recent events in the Arctic - evidence, not hearsay.
That's commendable. Could you provide some more information on this alleged White House emergency meeting?
So far, all sources reporting on this are just rehashing the bits of information from the guardian article or the West Australian.
The W.A. piece starts by stating this:
In a room at the White House next week, an extraordinary meeting of the brightest minds will attempt to form a strategy to curb climate change's crippling effects on the Arctic.
and ends with:
At the White House meeting, he and other scientists have been asked to come up with scenarios that will inform research program on changes in the Arctic and the impacts on Arctic ecosystems.The Arctic is thought to be warming twice as fast as NASA's calculation of a 0.8C rise in temperatures globally since 1880.
There is also nothing to be found here or here.
In the first decade since 2000, the 49th state cooled 2.4 degrees Fahrenheit."
The deniers are fooling only themselves and I honestly don't understand how some people can sit back and deny the very evidence that their eyes can see
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by burdman30ott6
The facts conflict so much that I am not sure what is happening. The people I know in Alaska say that the glaciers they see are shrinking.
Originally posted by Gazrok
Because for every piece of "evidence" it is happening, there is other "evidence" contradicting it. Also, our ability to accurately measure this idea seems to be non-existent. The models never hold up to scrutiny, and predictions made years ago prove erroneous, etc.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by Mamatus
The deniers are fooling only themselves and I honestly don't understand how some people can sit back and deny the very evidence that their eyes can see
Because for every piece of "evidence" it is happening, there is other "evidence" contradicting it. Also, our ability to accurately measure this idea seems to be non-existent. The models never hold up to scrutiny, and predictions made years ago prove erroneous, etc.