It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by Carreau
Congratulations on the most disgusting post of the day.
Originally posted by Berzerked
Now. Let's be real here. You may not like Israel, but at the end of the day, they are our allies. (on paper anyways)
Allies dont strafe, bomb and fire bomb one of your ships, trying to sink it, ask any USS Liberty survivor if they consider Israel and ally.
I wish Israel complete destruction but it wont happen, the US would never allow it.edit on 5-5-2013 by Berzerked because: (no reason given)
reply to post by Alternative4u
TextI being Christian feel Israel should and soon will be cleaned off the map, it is long over due.
Originally posted by canucks555
Now. Let's be real here. You may not like Israel, but at the end of the day, they are our allies. (on paper anyways)
Originally posted by Xeven
I would support Israel because most Serians and Iranians worship a religion that cannot live in peace with other religions if it's teachings are followed devoutly. Seriously, I don't think we can ever have peace when people worship religions that call for death to those who refuse to follow it.
Those people are not born evil they are taught to become evil by their religion.edit on 5-5-2013 by Xeven because: (no reason given)
We put Israel where it is. In a way, it's our fault when they (Israel) acts up. Do we abandon them?
www.thereligionofpeace.com...
Quran (2:191-193) - "And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah." The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.
edit on 5-5-2013 by Xeven because: (no reason given)
So you want something more Recent by OUR ALLY ?
Originally posted by canucks555
Harsh attitude, but does strafing a ship several decades ago amount to you wanting to see the entire state destroyed?