posted on May, 9 2013 @ 09:59 PM
So, the reason for her being on the list isn't because she killed anyone, because she didn't kill anyone, that we know of.
And the reason isn't because she was present during the commission of a crime involving a gun that resulted in murder. Being present during the
commission of a gun crime resulting in murder is not a terrorist act.
The reason given is: because she is a part of a terrorist group called the Black Liberation Army.
Is she the only member of this group?
If not, then, is she the only member of this group that has been identified?
If not, then, why is she the only member to be added to the terrorist watch list?
It says this group did bombings and kidnappings and other types of havoc.
Did she do all the bombings and killings and kidnappings? By herself? Did she do any?
If not, who did? Have they all been apprehended or slain? Have they not yet been identified?
Why arent any of these bombers or kidnappers on the list? They were "a member of a terrorist group", which is the only reason this woman was added
to the list. But not only were they members, but they participated in terroristic acts.
It says this group was active in the US from 1970 to 1981.
So they are currently not operating on US soil.
Where are they operating? Are they bombing the heck out of Cuba now? What is their level of activity compared to other terrorist groups around the
world that are "not currently operating inside the US"? What makes this one 66 year old woman from this one group so dangerous compared to other
people in this group or others? I mean, at the very least, she must be the leader of BLA and giving out all the orders, right? If not, then, shouldnt
THAT person be on the list??
And whether or not she is the one giving orders, or someone else is giving the orders... What are the orders? Orders to do WHAT? What acts of
terrorism have been committed by this group in the past 3 decades? Anything?
Maybe it was that book she wrote? Or the letter to the Vatican? Maybe its just the fact that she continues to speak out about her experiences she's
had and her opinions about the world. Honestly that seems like the most dangerous thing to a government.
The most dangerous thing to a government, is an idea whose time has come.
It seems like maybe they are trying to widen the racial divide a bit more... Get the panthers all riled up about it...
I remember maybe 3 years ago hearing of a prediction about female terrorists... Or at least, it would be blamed on women... And then, I don't
remember if this was in the op or a comment from another member, but, Something about surgically implanted bombs inside a woman who has just given
birth or had the fetus...removed...so the skin would still be stretchy and you could fit a bomb in there and it just looks like a pregnant woman. I
thought it sounded pretty crazy... But perhaps they are now beginning to implant the meme of "dangerous women" and "female terrorists" into our
mind... and then it becomes reality.
I KNOW tptb are getting restless with only being able to accuse half the human race (males) of being terrorists. Now they have enacted "their
version" of femenism, coupled with the vaginization of men, and finally they have what they want... One single entity they can take aim at. There
will no longer be a "mens problem" or women's problem", it will be everyones problem. No more taking it easy on females. Just taze the living fark
outta her and slam her face into the ground, she could just as likely be a terrorist as anyone else! Oh but she's pregnant? How do you know that's
not a bomb!?!?!!?!