It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by undo
the teaching that the belief in the existence of many gods, is a bad thing, is a catholic stance on scripture. there are many examples of references to other gods, a divine council, and variants on that theme. principalities, powers, rulers of the darkness. the line you've taken is similar to the same one the rcc took : hard line, no holds barred, everybody sucks but us. that does not ring true to me. it's not even scriptural, for that matter.
Originally posted by undo
you misread my statement, which is related to the fact, you're running a rcc meme and don't even know it.
i didn't say the worship, i said the existence. i didn't say they were more important, i said they exist. i'm not an idiot.
Originally posted by undo
examples of old rcc memes in existence today:
the world is only 6000 years old.
adam was one guy.
eve was the first female.
there was no female adam.
eve was made from the first man, adam.
the noah story is about one flood, that happened at one point, and all the animals on the planet were there in pairs.
god is only one god. ain't no other gods.
god went to abe's tent on his way to sodom and gomorrah.
etc. whole sections of scripture just tossed out and ignored.
doesn't mean you won't go to heaven, just means you're running a catholic meme.
not my fault. lol
Originally posted by borntowatch
Not all Catholics are that bad as are not all Protestants but your point is a very timely warning to the church. It will fall on deaf ears sadly as most Christians dont acknowledge their sin until we end up in Babylon.
Good work
Originally posted by undo
Originally posted by borntowatch
Not all Catholics are that bad as are not all Protestants but your point is a very timely warning to the church. It will fall on deaf ears sadly as most Christians dont acknowledge their sin until we end up in Babylon.
Good work
what sin is that? i'm curious how you know that most christians have unforgiven sins.
let's back up a bit: what is sin?
Originally posted by Hopechest
Genesis is a complete rip off of Sumerian text.
The whole book is a complete fallicy.
Do a side by side comparison of the two and you will see its a bit more than coincidence.
Originally posted by undo
Originally posted by Hopechest
Genesis is a complete rip off of Sumerian text.
The whole book is a complete fallicy.
Do a side by side comparison of the two and you will see its a bit more than coincidence.
i don't think it's a rip off. i think it's a fascinating combination of the story of creation, as recounted by a pharaoh's adopted son (moses), from an egyptian and mesopotamian backdrop. some of noahs descendants repopulated egypt folowing the black sea flood and would've had the same history as the sumerians. it just has its own cultural twists. for example, adam is atum. the adam people were named after their creators. atum is the egyptian god of creation. people get hung up on national boundaries. there are no national boundaries in moses' story, between egypt and mesopotamia.
edit on 5-5-2013 by undo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by undo
sigh, this is the problem i have with that argument:
1. there were semites (shem-ites, descendants of shem) in mesopotamia following the black sea flood. this means, they lived thru the same events as those mentioned in the text. there's evidence that people of similar genetics to modern day jews and arabs, were in that area during ubaid, which is the timeframe directly preceeding sumer.
2. if semites were there, it's not a rip off. it's just told from the position of say, the human slaves of the timeframe. ever read the akkadian text ENMERKAR AND THE LORD OF ARRATA? (hint: enmerkar is nimrod and also, egyptian narmer). you should, if you haven't, cause it's all kinds of fascinating.
3. as regards god. ever consider that god is a pharaonic title?edit on 5-5-2013 by undo because: (no reason given)