Larry Sinclair, Is a Gay man that alleges he has had sexual encounters and has done drugs with then Senator Obama. He gives quite an impressive
account of details in his press conference at the National Press Club. It does appear this man has a shady past as well has agreed to and failed a
polygraph. But here's the twist, the man who administered the polygraph Edward I. Gelb, is an academic fraud and wrote conflicting results than what
the computer had showed. (see video at bottom)
Here is Mr. Sinclair's Testimony
In late May, Wash. DC-based investigative journalist Wayne Madsen had a bombshell revelation about Obama’s membership in a Chicago gay club, Man’s
Country. Madsen also reported on Obama’s sexual relationships with other men, including named D.C. politicians and Donald Young, the openly-gay
choir-director of the church in Chicago of which Obama was a member for some 20 years — Jeremy Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ
More importantly are the subsequent murders that have taken place.
Norma Jean Young ( former Employee of the Chicago Police Department ) and mother of openly gay Donald Young ( member of Chicago's Trinity United
Church ) alleges that her son was murdered to conceal his involvement with Obama.
Norma Jean Young, the 76-year old mother of the late Trinity United Church of Christ choir director Donald Young, has spoken out and declared that
persons trying to protect Obama murdered her son at the height of the 2007 Democratic presidential primary to protect Obama from embarrassing
revelations about his homosexual relationship with her son.
2 other openly gay members of the church , Larry Bland and Nate Spencer are also dead.
In late 2007 when Senator Obama was preparing to run for pres. all 3 men come up dead in a span of 1½ months, 2 of the 3 were murdered execution
There is alot of high strangeness to this story and i'm eager to see what ATS minds will have to say.
As i'm sure you all will do your own research and digging.
If there is any validity to this it would be noteworthy to remember that Obama was the first US Pres. to endorse gay marriage.
Unless you have a shady history and tons of money flowing in the campaign coffers you don't get elected to the blackhouse. The shady history is what
the elite use as collateral in case you don't do what they want you to do.
I would not be suprised at all if BHO did drugs and was gay. Its not even a big deal to me. Whats more a big deal is having Lady Gaga at his
official celebration party. The ultimate evil masonic mainstream symbol.
As with most things in life, where there's smoke, there's fire.
I don't care that he's gay, bi, or whatever. I don't care how much he partied with drugs. But I find that the hypocrisy of pushing a drug war to
be most reprehensible.
However, he's a politician. One who came out of total obscurity to take the presidency. That alone tells me all I need to know about the man. He
is owned, body and soul, by the corporate devil and the slime who are known as the banking "elite". He is selling out our country. Being a
proponent of gay marriage means little when he knows damned well that he is the captain of the Titanic.
Only difference between him and the original captain is, this one gets a private helicopter ride off the sinking ship.
If this is true, (and I don't think for a second that the murder part is true) why is Obama's sex life ANY of our business? What if he had sex with
men? I don't care. And drugs? He himself has said and written in his books about his previous drug use. Again, so what?
And some people are dead, so Obama murdered them? And got away with it? Yeah. Right. That's totally logical.
This isn't the first time I've heard about this. As a matter of fact...
Here's a major problem with this stuff, let's say the drug use and sex part is true (forget the apparent execution style killings for a
If you judge Obama because he got head in a limo from a dude, and did drugs while this happened... You (the public) limit yourselves to only electing
politicians that lie.
If you elect politicians that admit to their indiscretions... You are electing people that are less likely to be manipulated by controlling interests
that dig dirt on them. You are electing honest people. You are electing people that have less skeletons in the closet.
However, it seems when indiscretions are confirmed, people like to form lynching parties.
It's pretty obvious people "digging for the truth" always tend to come from opposite sides of the partisan line as well. It's nice to know these
things... Should people react on them? Personally, I say "No".
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2013, The Above Network, LLC.