It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Yep, that's right.
It all comes down to this...
I shouldn't have guns because they are dangerous....
But you can have other dangerous things because you want to.
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
I'm saying that you should acknowledge that your freedom comes at a cost. And one part of that cost is that in some cases tragedies like this will happen. That's true of guns and cars.
Originally posted by seabag
My "Marine mindset" provided the so-called "real world" and freedom you enjoy today. You're welcome!
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
I'm saying that you should acknowledge that your freedom comes at a cost. And one part of that cost is that in some cases tragedies like this will happen. That's true of guns and cars.
All freedom comes with that cost. A cost which is never high enough to reduce freedom. We've all lost too much already.
Life ends in death. What short life we have should be lived in liberty.
Naturally I'm also asking you to consider the relative utility of objects with their risks, something you seem unable or unwilling to do.
"Sorry, but like 90 per cent of the world I don't really care about the US Constitution." JuniorDisco, 5-3-13
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by JuniorDisco
Yes. Own whatever the hell you want.
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by JuniorDisco
Yes. Own whatever the hell you want.
Cool. Can my brother own whatever he wants too? I mean, he's in jail currently, but I guess that should be no barrier to him having a firearm?
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
Originally posted by eriktheawful
The only reason that there are a number of dead children due to gun ownership is because there are a number of idiots that cause that situation by being stupid and irresponsible.
Just as there are an even bigger number of idiots that cause a even bigger number of children to be dead because of cars for the same reason.
Yes, I know. I say this above. But the idiots aren't going to disappear and so we have to make a decision about an object's utility vs its risks and then legislate. You may disagree with me about the usefulness of guns but I doubt you disagree with notion of acting that way.
Put it another way, if you don't entertain this system then that's an argument for legalising anything. We do not allow people to have their own nuclear warheads, and yet they are simply neutral objects and only idiots and the insane would damage themselves and others with them.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Actually, you are the one that is unwilling to consider the utility of guns.
Their use is laid out in the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
But, we have seen what you think of the US Constitution.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by JuniorDisco
Yes. Own whatever the hell you want.
Cool. Can my brother own whatever he wants too? I mean, he's in jail currently, but I guess that should be no barrier to him having a firearm?
Once he's out his debt is paid. I see no reason to prohibit ownership once the debt has been paid.
Do you think that if you keep saying this it might come true?
That means you can't amend that bit of paper right? Like, if circumstances change?
Originally posted by butcherguy
You heard me say it here recently?
That's what amendment means, doesn't it? I referenced the 2nd Amendment, there have been a lot more.
You should get on that, you know, nullifying the 2nd. The Democratic controlled Senate can't pass a bill to straighten out loopholes at gunshows... when it the compromise was co-sponsored by a Republican.......... dream much?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by JuniorDisco
Sure.
You're not going to trap me into some prohibitionist corner.
He can have a warehouse full of suitcase bombs for all I care.
The problem arises in use. Not potential use but actual use.
If he gets his jollies blowing up suitcase bombs on his back fifty to no harm of person or property that is not his own then by all means lets have a cookout and blow up some suitcase bombs.
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Only idiots bring out that argument, mainly because they have no argument that works other than that.
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
reply to post by eriktheawful
Right. so instead of try to refute a perfectly reasonable argument that explores the limits of what a free people should be allowed to own, you prefer to produce an embarrassing rant about... sort of not much. I agree some people are often irresponsible nowadays. But they always have been. And they've always been stupid. If you think there was a golden era where there weren't any idiots then you're wrong.
But anyway that has nothing to do with what I wrote. It isn't stupid to suggest that one acknowledge the risk vs the utility of private ownership of an object. Whether you like it or not we do this every day, and you do it too, I imagine. Unless you think there are no objects people should not be allowed to own?
And I'm not even against gun ownership, you're wrong about that as well.