It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThreeBears
As for your son, OK I hear is bad, as is Kansas. I will recommend a web site, I didn't now of they have an OK office but get n that site and research like mad to see what rights he does have and how to protect him, his human rights,
Also to network with other parents dealing with the same thing. That site is H.E.A.L., just google that, it's a teens human rights site, to the left there is tons of research, into the juv system, boot Camps, etc., the abuses, investigations, corrupt courts, you name it. Also, Ablechild.org is another good site, it's more to do with schools trying to force drug. Now with criminal (why schools are Notorious fr charging for the most petty of things) once the child is in the criminal you see then the rights that a child/parent Would have, etc such as fighting force drugging, etc is gone, why the mental health pharma butchers push for these schools to screen and criminalize, you see They want their hands on these kids, as their guinni pigs. Juvenile courts are messed up even more than adult...so you Really have to stay on top of it.
I can't stress enough how important it is to TEACH your children the Human Rights, even those not enforced, what TORT law is, how they can sue, how they can fight for their rights because the system really binds them this way, why I suggest the H.E.A.L. Site to you, it's a group of parents and teens that have fought to keep their children alive, etc, oh having kids arrested for SELF DEFENSE is a very common tactic. It works two ways, one to recruit kids for the pharma death dealers and two, to instill into kids to willingly accept abuse at hands of any authority. Beh mod Nazis love to provoke kids into anger because pose they know full well how to manipulate kids into doing just what it takes to get them bound in the system...so it's vital to get as much outside support and attention, even if it doesn't seem That serious. Make sure to document Everything, to hire a good juvenile advocate if need be (I would pronto) and to let the system know, you will protect his civil and human rights.
Originally posted by abbey7777
Hahahhahha if they knew what we did as kids in the 70s and eighties they would have locked us up also
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by buddhasystem
I find this statement a bit delusional. A lot of kids LOVE blowing things up (cf Mentos+Soda), or even rocketry, but it's not an evidence of talent or real inclination to the subject of chemistry beyond curiosity. Some of my friends were building crude DIY firearms when they were kids, none of them are gunsmiths now.
Maybe someone should have put them in a gunsmithing course?
They were free whatever they wanted to do. It was a good school, by the way. All I said there is no correlation between blowing up stuff and having a talent in a discipline XYZ.
Originally posted by winofiend
Originally posted by wewillnotcomply666
Originally posted by LogicGrind
reply to post by trollz
It wasn't a science project.
www.theledger.com...
The girl told authorities she was conducting a science experiment, according to Bartow police, but science teachers at the school said they knew nothing about it.
She did this on her own with a lot of other kids around.
Please tell me how that means that it was not a science experiment ? If i do a science experiment in my basement without my science teacher present to watch it , was it really a science experiment ?
You're all doomed.. This is patently obvious. You can't differentiate between REAL and what's in your heads.
No, this was NOT a project. That would imply the school was involved, as she was on school property. She was simply making what she knew would explode. At school. Where there is a duty of care expected of the teaching staff.
Felony charges? certainly not, but stop trying to make out she was simply making a pretend volcano.
As to this "Back in my day, .. so now I'd be a terrorist!" well, yeah.. times have changed. You don't get to walk barefoot in the local park either, because rufus the hobo will steal you damn kids. The world stinks.
We certainly don't need little miss explodesalot maiming the slow kids at her school tho.
This is bizarre... you just don't see it.. all you see is a blue light and hand cuffs... struth..
Procedural History:
The state of North Carolina charged J.D.B. with breaking and entering and larceny. The public defender who represented J.D.B. moved to suppress his statements and any evidence gathered as a result of those statements. The public defender argued on behalf of J.D.B. that J.D.B. was in custody at the time he was interrogated and that the police had failed to give him a Miranda warning. The state trial court ruled that J.D.B. was not in police custody and denied the motion to suppress the statements and evidence. The court adjudicated him delinquent, finding that J.D.B had violated criminal laws.
J.D.B.'s public defender disagreed and appealed first to the North Carolina Court of Appeals and then to the North Carolina Supreme Court. Both appellate courts agreed with the trial court. The North Carolina Supreme Court held that the test for custody did not include consideration of the age of an individual subjected to questioning by police.
Issue:
"[W]hether the Miranda custody analysis includes consideration of a juvenile suspect's age." More specifically, whether "a child's age 'would have affected how a reasonable person' in the suspect's position 'would perceive his or her freedom to leave.'"
Supreme Court holding:
Yes. "So long as the child's age was known to the officer at the time of police questioning, or would have been objectively apparent to any reasonable officer, its inclusion in the custody analysis is consistent with the objective nature of the test. . . . Just as police officers are competent to account for other objective circumstances that are a matter of degree such as the length of questioning or the number of officers present, so too are they competent to evaluate the effect of relative age."
The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the North Carolina Supreme Court and remanded the case to the lower court to determine whether, taking his age into consideration, J.D.B. was in custody when he was interrogated.
Originally posted by Xnibiru
She did a dangerous thing to others around.
Originally posted by Ghost375
reply to post by wewillnotcomply666
If you read and comprehended my post, which you obviously aren't capable of, you would have read that I acknowledge that and point out that that is how kids go blind and get seriously injured!!
This is a serious topic, and if people are too ignorant to know anything about it, they need to stfu.edit on 1-5-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)edit on 1-5-2013 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ghost375
Originally posted by wewillnotcomply666
No, i comprehend your post quite well. You are trying to imply that because you "didnt take chemicals out from under the sink and mix them" that it is not normal child behavior. This is the 21st century and thats pretty damn close to normal behaviour for a child of this time .
I made no such implication. They were two completely separate points that were not related.
and no, it's not normal behavior.
Originally posted by LogicGrind
reply to post by trollz
It wasn't a science project.
www.theledger.com...
The girl told authorities she was conducting a science experiment, according to Bartow police, but science teachers at the school said they knew nothing about it.
She did this on her own with a lot of other kids around.