posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 07:15 PM
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Meanwhile it was announced that high-profile death penalty lawyer Judy Clarke has joined the defence of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Tamerlan Tsarnaev's brother
and suspected co-conspirator.
Ms Clarke is nationally known for her work on high-profile cases.
Most recently she worked on the defence of Jared Loughner, who killed six and severely injured former Representative Gabrielle Giffords, and has also
represented "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski and Atlanta Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph during sentencing.
Here is an interview with the snake who calls herself Tsarnaev's defense lawyer:
"The names of her past clients — Susan Smith, Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski, the Atlanta Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph and most recently, Tucson
shooter Jared Loughner — run like a list of the most reviled in American criminal history."
There are many who are facing the death penalty. Yet she seems to get mostly the 'celebrity' cases. No ordinary murder cases for her!
"... When she first meets them, they do not want to plead guilty
. Her job is to change their resolve
, she said."
So the job of a defense attorney is to get her clients to plead guilty? With a 'defense' lawyer like this, who needs a prosecutor?
“They’re looking into the lens of life in prison in a box,” she said. “Our job is to provide them with a reason to live.”
No, her job is defend her client's interests in a diligent manner, not pretend to be their priest.
"....In most cases, she said she finds underlying mental illness."
So how come she never attempts the insanity defense?
Remember this woman never asked the investigators why they had more bullet holes at the Tucson shooting crime scene than Loughner had bullets in his
gun. I think her real job is to not challenge the official narrative with a messy trial, and to make the defendant go away with as little fuss as
possible. The actual guilt or innocence of her clients is of no interest to her.
edit on 30-4-2013 by starviego because: (no reason given)