It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Liquesence
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Yes. When people (politicians and citizens alike) agree that it is okay to hold a US citizen as an enemy combatant and deny the right of due process, we are in very dark days.
This paves the way for citizens to be held as combatants at the descretion of those in power and paves the way for anyone to be held and denied due process regardless of the actuality of the crime.
This is a scary slippery slope and that a politician would condone this is frightening.
Rabbit, your commentary is spot on. One thing I have noticed, and admire, is how we on both sides of the isle and with sometimes fundamental political differences are united in the preservation of liberty and rights that this incident has brought.
What about the Supreme Court that has ruled before that in certain instances it is legal to designate a US citizen as an unlawful enemy combatant? If any citizen joins the ranks of an enemy we are actively at war with they can be held in such status.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I'd like to reply to another point in a more general way because it could too easily become vicious if directed specifically and I'm simply not going there. However, the point must be made either way.
The dead brother was a citizen. Naturalized or not, a citizen is a citizen. The one in custody was not a citizen but a perm. legal resident by way of his green card/residency card and in the pipeline to become a naturalized citizen. Whether that coulda/woulda/shoulda happened is 100% beside the point.
WASHINGTON -- Despite reports that Tamerlan Tsarnaev harbored resentment over the U.S. denying his citizenship application, the application was still pending at the time of the Boston Marathon bombings, a law enforcement source said Sunday.
Tamerlan, 26, filed an application for citizenship six months ago and immigration officials had not yet made a decision on his case at the time of the Boston Marathon bombings, the source said.
Immigration officials were aware of a domestic violence charge on his record and also knew that the FBI had questioned him, the source said, but it's unclear what Tamerlan was told about his prospects for citizenship.
Days after the Boston Marathon bombings that killed three and injured more than 170, investigators are still trying to understand the motives of of the two prime suspects, Tamerlan and his younger brother, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19. Authorities have begun to delve into the details of how the brothers came to be in the United States.
The Tsarnaevs, ethnic Chechens, immigrated with their family from Russia about a decade ago. They were granted refugee status and settled in Cambridge. Tamerlan was a permanent resident and held a Russian passport.
A previous bid for citizenship was documented by Toronto-based photographer and scientist Johannes Hirn, who published a 15-page photo essay that depicted Tamerlan training for the U.S. Olympic team. The photo essay, titled, "Will Box for Passport," said that Tamerlan hoped to become a naturalized U.S. citizen by earning a place on the team.
But an official with USA Boxing, the official body that oversees amateur boxing, said Tamerlan was ineligible to compete in Olympic qualifying events because he was not a citizen.
Tamerlan's brother Dzhokhar became a U.S. citizen on Sept. 11, 2012. He was a student at the University of Massachusetts in Dartmouth, where various friends described him as social and outgoing.
Originally posted by CasaVigilante
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Hunting them like terrorists and then TREATING them (Americans ..like it or not) like "enemy combatants" after arrest and confinement are entirely different things.
Tamerlan was not an American citizen. His brother Dzhokhar was naturalized on Sept 11th 2012, but Tamerlan's citizenship was put on indefinite hold because he was a suspected terrorist.
As a result of an exchange of information with the Russians it seems doubtful that the State Department would have allowed him to become a US citizen.
Had Tamerlan survived should the brothers have been treated differently in the eyes of the law - do you think?edit on 30-4-2013 by CasaVigilante because: (no reason given)
You are dead wrong. What is the matter with your research skills? You are embarrassing yourself here - Tamerlan was NOT a citizen but his brother Dzokhar was a citizen as of Sept.2012 as I stated before.
Please do the work OK?
Tamerlan Tsarnaev's citizenship application was pending AS IN HELD UP!!!
Originally posted by roadgravel
But you're correct that is was a massive error by Holder to Mirandize him after 16 or the 48 hours.
True, it should have been done as soon as they took him into custody, The more that exceptions to rights are made, the better the chance your rights will no longer exist.
Originally posted by roadgravel
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Don't worry. A jury of typical american citizens will convict on filmy evidence if the case isn't rock solid even without a confession. He isn't getting free.
The rule of Miranda is not, therefore, absolute and can be a bit more elastic in cases of public safety.[8] Under this exception, to be admissible in the government's direct case at a trial, the questioning must not be "actually compelled by police conduct which overcame his will to resist," and must be focused and limited, involving a situation "in which police officers ask questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety."
must be focused and limited, involving a situation "in which police officers ask questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety