posted on Apr, 29 2013 @ 03:34 PM
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Sorry, but SOHO offered me no Composite Image of our sun in 1996.
So you thought it would therefore be ok to try to compare it to a single image from 1996? How is that supposed to be relevant or a fair comparison?
Is it somehow relevant simply because you weren't spoon-fed a composite image from 1996 which, I might add, was during a solar minimum? What
prevented you from making your own composite image from 1996? Was it just too much work for you? Why post a single image then?
I guess it can be stated that i see relationships that others cannot. Hmmm.....
Actually I think it can be better stated that you don't understand critical differences in the things you presented. A composite image from a solar
maximum, even a weak maximum, is nothing at all like a single image from solar minimum. Apples and oranges doesn't even begin to cover
edit on 29-4-2013 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)