It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chris McGee
I don't know, here's a sample of some of the crme policies:
� Within the first day of a Conservative Government, we will announce plans to prevent police officers having to fill in a form every time they stop someone.
� Within the first week, we will announce the ending of Labour�s early release from prison scheme.
� Within the first month, we will start our new prison building programme and the recruitment of an extra 5,000 police officers each year.
I agree with all of this, hopefully it'll arrest the decline on the streets of Britain.
As for the budget, it's not just the Tories who say it's messed up, most economists say there is a black hole that Brown won't be able to fill.
Gordon Brown is going to break his own �golden rule� of borrowing solely for investment over the economic cycle. Indeed, the only way he won�t do so is by redefining the economic cycle (cries of "Fix!" from the back).
www.moneyextra.com...
The Chancellor was forced to increase greatly his forecasts for the amount the Government will borrow this year as the worsening health of public finances became clear.
A year ago the chancellor predicted export growth of 5.5% in 2004; this now turns out to be only 2.25%.
Originally posted by Chris McGee
Well, sminkey, I live in a pretty crappy area and I experience the 'rising tide' almost every day. What I want is for the police in this country to be out on the beat, protecting British citizens rather than sitting in a police station filling out forms.
Where you got not having to justify their actions from, i do not know.
As for Gordon's economic forecasts and performance, I suggest you check out the facts.
The Chancellor was forced to increase greatly his forecasts for the amount the Government will borrow this year as the worsening health of public finances became clear.
www.telegraph.co.uk.../money/2003/12/11/cnbud11.xml
Biggest deficit in a decade? Bravo, Gordon.
A year ago the chancellor predicted export growth of 5.5% in 2004; this now turns out to be only 2.25%.
politics.guardian.co.uk...
That's some nice forecasting.
If all you have to debate with is the past then you have no argument at all. Remember the 70s? Winter of discontent ring a bell?
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- There are currently record numbers of British cops out on the streets.
It might not be perfection everywhere but this govs' is a much better record on crime than your tory mates' one.
If they are no longer required to properly log and file reports on their actions what would you call it?
It is true that the bald number in this case is a record but as a % of spending the equivelent peak under John Major would have been around �90 -100 billion in 'real terms' (todays money).
So what? You found a single small statistic at half what was predicted......it is still nothing like the dire recession and disaster your friends have been laughably predicting since day of of this gov in 1997.
7.5 yrs of being completely wrong every timeon any economic forecast of any substance.
Wow, the party of economic competence, not!
It is our experience with a particular parties' instincts and methods which guide us in our choices when it comes to polling day. As is the case with every gov that has ever been.
As for remembering old Labour's tough times, well OK but all you are doing there by mentioning this is illuminating how much the party has actually and genuinely changed and maintained that change.....
Not very clever politics if you ask me but then I'm not some kind of dopey tory stategist.
Originally posted by Chris McGee
There are currently record numbers of British police in cars or in stations doing paperwork.
Again, no-one is saying they will no longer need to log and file reports.
You have no case on this, a point proven by your previous two posts on this matter.
OK, lets dive into the past. Go look at the economy that Blair and Co inherited from the Tories.
READ THE WHOLE LINK
Again, go and look at the economy Labour inherited from the Tories.
Make your mind up.
Also, the poll tax cost a lot less than the council tax does now.
Can you justify the crippling tax burden that has been imposed on the British public?
The Labour party inherited a very strong economy from the Tories.
For the first couple of years Gordon Brown was committed to Tory spending plans. Since he has been released from those plans we have been running deficit upon deficit. Can you give a credible reason for that?
Pfft, great argument.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Yeah, of course they all are.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Do you mean the record level of gov debt which was also accellerating at a record rate?
.....and who's kidding who here? Do you think anyone in their right mind believes the local taxes would not have risen - at all - under the tory crowd or the indirect taxes year in year out!?
Yes, it's called making the necessary investment into the UK's public services and economy.......or are you tories now implying you would not have invested in the disgustingly appalling public services your underinvestment had left us in 1997?
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
[Tell me, do you believe any old tory propaganda without the slightest bit of consideration or question?
The tories know the last thing they want to get into is the detail of what they actually mean about any of this cos the detail (if there is any, at all!) makes clear what shallow populist crud this 'idea' actually is.
I think you should consider a little just what paperwork the cops do complete when they have to now and what that is all about.....and that it has already been looked at several times to see what can be taken away.
Do you mean the record level of gov debt which was also accellerating at a record rate?
The debt that was eating up ever increasing numbers of billions of � just in 'dead' debt interest repayment and taking funds away which could have been spent on actual services/ pensions/investment, hmmm?
As far as the economy goes your guys had their go and screwed up royally - twice! - to claim this gov's much better running of the economy is all down to the troy 'legacy' is the height of dellusion.....as everyone but the tiny band of tory support knows (as will be proven for the 3rd landslide running come polling day in approx 6 months or so).
GDP grew at an annual rate of 2-2 1/2 per cent in the second half of 1995 and for much of 1996. But it accelerated sharply last autumn, since when it has been rising at an annualised rate of 3 1/2 -4 1/2 per cent, driven by strong consumer spending growth. Unemployment has continued to fall, and the rate of decline appears to have gathered pace since the autumn (although the fall in the claimant count has been amplified by the introduction of the Jobseeker's Allowance). Underlying retail price inflation (i.e. excluding mortgage interest payments) has fallen from around 3 per cent at the end of last year to 2.5per cent at present, reflecting the effects of sterling's appreciation.
Tell you what then, matey, convince your party to stand on a platform of returning the poll tax.....and see how many tens of MPs you get returned at the next poll.
Income tax rates have not changed at all under this gov......oh, wait a minute, that's not true is it.....the rates of income tax in the UK have actually gone down! The 10% band has been significantly broadened, the allowances have gone up and the middle rate was reduced too.
Tax Freedom Day - the day when people stop working to pay taxes and instead start working for themselves - has moved from May 27 in 1997, the year the Tories lost power, to June 10 this year.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Labour = More paper work
More paper work = Less time on the beat
And Gordon Brown isn't borrowing millions and millions!!!!
Conservatives balance the book.
Labour borrows and taxs more to spend more.
So the odds of a similar Conservative increase in council tax would have been unlikely.
Its all very well saying that we need to increase taxes to make a investment, but that also imply's that the tax will need to stay higher to continue the investment.
Also, do Governments really effect the economy that much, the Governments economic influence is proberly restricted to the homeland areas, but a economy is mainly effected by external influence, oil, terrorism, trading rivals etc
Originally posted by Chris McGee
No facts, no evidence, just the same old 'tory propaganda' cr@p and a poor attack on policy without any form of rational analysis.
Nice way of avoiding the point.
National insurance up 1p in the pound.
Taxes on everything (cigs, booze, houses) have contributed to the tax burden.
Who suffers most from taxes on cigarettes, alcohol and petrol? The well-off? No.
Tax Freedom Day - the day when people stop working to pay taxes and instead start working for themselves - has moved from May 27 in 1997, the year the Tories lost power, to June 10 this year.
You present no facts to back up your arguments, you attack anything which may prove you wrong as propaganda, you cynically avoid questions you have no answer to and when all that fails, you resort to childish baiting and name calling.
originally posted by sminkeypinkey
care to quantify that UK Wizard?
This gov's short term current account borrowing is relatively low actually
UK Wizard I suggest you go anfd look at their council tax record rather than simply repeat a propaganda myth.
Much of public spending is an on-going expense. Treating people on the NHS is never going to be a one-off cost is it?
Std rate of income tax down 1p too, remember, hmm?
It is egalitarian and right to let the poor smoke and drink themselves to death?
Originally posted by Chris McGee
�37bn this year
�31bn next year (forecasted)
�27bn the year after (forecasted)
I turn to net borrowing. Compared with 8 per cent ten years ago, and an average of 6 per cent over the early nineties, net borrowing this year and future years to 2008-9 is, as a percentage of GDP, 3.4, 2.8, 2.5, 2.1, 1.9 and 1.6 per cent of GDP, with, for this and future years, the cash figures �37.5 billions, �33 billions, and then �31, �27, �27 and �23 billions.
Net borrowing adjusted for the economic cycle, is just 2.4 per cent this year and in future years 2.1, 2.3, 2.1, 1.9 and 1.6 per cent of GDP.
A decade ago after the end of the last world recession the British deficit was the equivalent of �90 billion pounds, around two and a half times higher than today.
Considering he only got his forecast wrong by �11bn for this year, we can take those figures as gospel
and here's your comparison:
1997 2004/05
A �399.33 �783.45
B �465.89 �914.02
C �532.44 �1,044.59
E �732.11 �1,436.31
F �865.22 �1,697.45
G �998.33 �1,958.61
H �1,198.00 �2,350.32
I agree with you here, public services do need extra investment (yes, i know, it's probably our fault ) but it must be targeted in the right places. New equipment, new buildings, new infrastructure, more staff, better training. Not so train drivers can earn �35,000 per year for a 35 hour week (for example).
Yes, the level of direct taxation has remained relatively stable, but what about all the other tax increases, hmm?
Now who's the melodramatic drama queen? I don't think it's egalitarian to reserve smoking and drinking for those that can afford it, you plastic socialist. .
You see? Some humour can be a very good thing.
Nevertheless UK Wizard's claim could do with a little support.
There is a world of difference between this and the 'prove everything' line you have been pushing; ask him, it's not something I make such a big deal over very often because in many instances the data is being 'cherry picked' to use so selectively......
Originally posted by Chris McGee
Yeah, i'm starting to get that now, in my (short) experience on ATS everyone seems to want links and proof to back up everything.
On the subject of the borrowing, you need to remember the �22bn windfall Brown got from the 3G licences. That doesn't come along every day.
It worries me that he is planning to borrow every year up until 2009, that's a lot of debt to take on.
The Tories may not have the best record on debt but we did have a war to fight and a recession midway through our term.
Even with the current surplus he has, that level of borrowing will put us �75bn in the hole by 2009.
I would support a tax increase on certain types of booze, seeing 3 litre bottles of cider in the local shop for �1.89 just makes me think it's way to cheap for the damage it does.
Maybe double the price on stuff like that (white cider etc) but don't hit wines, beers and spirits too hard, I think they're fairly well priced at the moment. This would keep it affordable for everyone but not so cheap that you can just hunt down the back of the couch and come up with enough cash to get mortal.
Cigarettes are a different matter. The price they are now, if you haven't stopped already, there's probably a 90% chance you're not going to. To push this up much more is just punishing the people who can least afford it.
Same goes with petrol, it's not the guy with the 3.0L Merc that feels it in the pocket, it's the guy with the clapped out fiesta on minimum wage.
The council tax increases are actually pretty much the same across the board if you take it as a percentage increase, all around 90% which is quite a rise even over 7 years.