It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by Covertblack
I have seen zero evidence of who did what to who. I have been told to look at only official pictures by fbi who was caught lying about knowing the boys.
Do you have some evidence based in fact that these boy have done anything, other than the word from officials who are know to lie to protect each other.
Can we trust the testimony of police who didn't realize they initiated a shoot out with an unarmed man?
Originally posted by tangonine
This photo is photoshopped. Has been debunked repeatedly.edit on 28-4-2013 by tangonine because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by tyranny22
Originally posted by tyranny22
Why would they think an onlooker would be "him"?
Because it COULD have been him (or another threat). The picture was taken during the split second that the LEO was discerning whether or not the person was a threat. He OBVIOUSLY discerned that the person was not a threat, because he didn't shoot.
If the photographer HAD been a threatening presence with a gun aimed at the LEO and the LEO wasn't prepared, he'd be dead now. Every LEO in a situation like this is acting in defense of his own life and the lives of the citizens.
If you're a LEO looking for a specific dangerous threat, ANYONE could be him. Have you seen police training where they train in various scenarios, using "shooting targets" of many types of people (pregnant women, children, and other "safe" targets along with threatening targets) to sharpen the discernment skills of the officers? It doesn't matter if the target is a pregnant woman or a gun-toting "criminal", the weapon is AIMED at it. The discernment comes when they decide NOT to shoot the pregnant woman (the innocent citizen) and decide to shoot the actual threat.
You all are just so pumped up about the big, bad, government taking over that you've lost all sense of reason.
Originally posted by Covertblack
Originally posted by tangonine
This photo is photoshopped. Has been debunked repeatedly.edit on 28-4-2013 by tangonine because: (no reason given)
Really, can you provide a source? Not being mean, just would like to know.
Originally posted by neformore
OK.
So, the Police are looking for someone who has blown up the finishing line of a Marathon.
Somoene who has killed one cop and seriously injured another.
Someone who has no qualms about throwing explosives at people.
And you're a cop, and you are moving down a street and the curtains of a building twitch or someone comes to a window suddenly and you notice it and your training kicks in because you are told in no uncertain terms that in a life and death situation, when someone could be about to shoot at you that you lead with your weapon, so that you are in a position to fire back immediately.
Thats a cop doing his job. He didn't shoot, but he had to scope.
That is what trained professionals do.
Its time someone called this BS hyseria for what it is. Total BS. These people do their job and were trying to ensure that some lunatic wasn't out there blowing up other people.
Got a problem with that? Fine. Next time some idiot like this goes on the rampage, YOU go and look for him, on the streets and hunt him down and bring him to justice, and put your life on the line to do it. If you aren't prepared to do that then maybe, just maybe, be thankful that there are people that do it, and understand that when they are out there doing it, they need to protect themselves as well, or at least give themselves a chance at being protected.
Where the hell has people's common sense gone? What do you expect this guy to do - sit there and not react until someone blows his head off?
edit on 28/4/13 by neformore because: spelling
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by neformore
Thier job! Stop it before it happens! the fbi KNEW who they were and did nothing!
The whole event could have been easily averted very quietly.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by inverslyproportional
Usually when the cops start aiming at civies, that is when we hear about an innocents getting shot.
(and what happens to those cops, paid leave)
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by Covertblack
Still no evidence. I would have no way tell if they are lying or not, i only know they have been known to.
Fool me once, fool me a second time, fool me again, no wait a minute> Don't get me wrong I don't discount the tragedy I just question wether it was not allowed to happen.
Also, after the fact there were ways it could have been handled with out getting more poeple killed.
I just don't want my kids to grow up in a world with military style police everywhere. It doesn't seem condusive to a free spirit.