It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are they compatible with my perpetual motion machine?
while this is true, i wouldn't like to see any bald eagles die,
if we dont get off coal the whole planet will die
An eastern Nevada wind farm could face a fine of up to $200,000 over the death of a golden eagle.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is investigating the bird's death at the Spring Valley Wind Farm near the Utah border, 350 miles east of Reno, spokesman Jeannie Stafford said.
San Francisco-based Pattern Energy, owner of the 152-megawatt wind energy project that sells power to Las Vegas-based NV Energy, turned over the dead eagle to federal authorities within 36 hours of its discovery in February.
Already, the test devices have produced efficiencies of almost 5 percent, among the highest ever reported for a quantum-dot PV based on zinc oxide, he says. With further development, Jean says, it may be possible to improve the devices’ overall efficiency beyond 10 percent, which is widely accepted as the minimum efficiency for a commercially viable solar cell.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
if you want to look at it from a science perspective instead of a political one,
The science is "the climate is changing" care to answer why push a technology that depends on the climate?
Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
the technology exists now and production is cheep and easy,
we dont need to wait,
germany is an example of what going solar can do,
AND IT MAKES THERE ECONOMY more competitive in the world stage as lower energy costs equal lower manufacturing costs
xploder
Originally posted by randomtangentsrme
reply to post by XPLodER
Read your own link.
Already, the test devices have produced efficiencies of almost 5 percent, among the highest ever reported for a quantum-dot PV based on zinc oxide, he says. With further development, Jean says, it may be possible to improve the devices’ overall efficiency beyond 10 percent, which is widely accepted as the minimum efficiency for a commercially viable solar cell.
It's not even at 5% efficiency. A far cry from the 50% you claim.
Jean says. Using a bottom-up growth process to grow these nanowires and infiltrating them with lead-sulfide quantum dots produces a 50 percent boost in the current generated by the solar cell
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
Yeah lets put Americans out of work, pay no attention to the largest polluter in the world-China
So what good does all that do?
Although this statement is correct, it can not be used for comparison.
Germany occupies 138,000 square miles, with 81 million people. The US occupies 3.8 million square miles, with 316 million people.
The magnitude of work required to transfer one to alternative energy vs the other is...quite frankly, mind boggling.
The US can make the change, but it will not be quick, cheap, or easy.
That makes coal a necessity until the infrastructure for the alternatives covers at least what the coal does currently.
Keep funding the R&D and when green Energy becomes cheaper and better
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
Yeah lets put Americans out of work, pay no attention to the largest polluter in the world-China
So what good does all that do?
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
Yeah lets put Americans out of work, pay no attention to the largest polluter in the world-China
So what good does all that do?
THIS....
What we do makes zero difference if our "slack" is picked up by China (and other nations as China changes)- Keep funding the R&D and when green Energy becomes cheaper and better the entire World will switch based on coast/benefit alone...The more scarce Coal becomes, the higher the price- At some point the Solar we keep improving and making cheaper will trump the Coal which we are extracting and making more costly.
EDIT : This is honestly a case where the free market will work if left alone...edit on 25-4-2013 by DarKPenguiN because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by peck420
reply to post by XPLodER
It has far more to do with the level of infrastructure changes required then it does with the power generation, or the consumption, for that matter.
You can be as advanced at either end as you want, if the grid in between can't handle it it needs to be changed.
That is the problem the US faces.
And it is a phenomenally sized problem.