posted on Apr, 25 2013 @ 10:53 PM
reply to post by Cabalis
Here is how I am going to disprove your double reflection theory.
First, let it be known that I do not have a PHD in math, science or and other relating field.
What I offer is my opinion and my opinion alone, based on logic.
The sun is a source of light, like the head lights of the SUV.
The reflective surface of the moon only reflects the light of the sun and is not as strong as the source.
Like the reflective surface of the car(moon) to the head lights(sun)
In order for there to be a shadow cast backwards, or behind the source(headlights) the light must be equal to if not greater than to penetrate one
original light source(headlights)
Just like the moon only reflects the sun’s light the car is only reflecting the SUV’s light and presumably cannot cast a backwards shadow.
Hopefully I did not have one too many “pops” for my logic to be sick.
edit on 25-4-2013 by whatzshaken because: (no reason given)
As well the angle of the Honda is not direct at the SUV. It is parked on a angle
edit on 25-4-2013 by whatzshaken because: (no reason
edit on 25-4-2013 by whatzshaken because: spelling and related observation