It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Trueman
Tru, I saw the Swahili girl and had to star and flag your thread right off. Wish I could
double up for the great idea.
Originally posted by Hanslune
The 85-7-7-1 a b c d question
This is an abbreviated question that use to get asked in Archaeology 101 and higher courses some years ago. This is a simplified version.
You are at an excavation, you have been successful!
You have 85 sources of dates that come in at 4,000 BP +-200 years
You have 7 sources of dates that come in at 3,750 BP with +- 500 years
You have another 7 sources of dates that come in at 4,250 BP with +- 500 years
Sources of dates are from pottery, Radiocarbon, Dendrochronology, Thermoluminescence, Optically stimulated luminescence, Archaeomagnetic, Lead Corrosion, Amino acid dating, Obsidian hydration and Rehydroxylation pottery comparison, etc
The above applies to all four the following alternatives which are:
A. You have one date that is to 12,000 BP with +- 1,000 years
B. You have one date that comes up as modern
C. You have a item that cannot be dated
D. You have an item that dates to 6,000 BP but with a range of +- 2,500 years
So what do you report as the age of the site for the following situations A, B, C and D?
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to post by punkinworks10
Just as an aside
That site profile fits a early jomon site, a an early andean culture , or somewhere in the fertile cresent, maybe in the area of the harrapan city states or it could be China or even Korea or north Africa, anatolia, Britain, iberia, the balkans, or melanesia.