Mr. Roddenberry had it right

page: 1
6

log in

join

posted on Apr, 24 2013 @ 12:33 AM
link   
I saw the thread Interpretation of Constution Will 'Have to Change' After Bostom Boming and I had a thought:

Citizens should be able to understand the law. They should be taught what the laws are, and know what the punishments are for breaking them. An entire industry (lawyers) have arisen because people are uniformed of the law. In court, Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Even lawyers not represent themselves in court!

I am a Star Trek fan. I have been, always will be


Perhaps Gene Roddenberry's vison for the future is where we should still aspire to?

Picard's speech in "The Drumhead" rings poignantly:




I love the United Federation of Planets Constitution as it's been drafted here

It's simple, clear and concise. Obviously it was based, and stands of the shoulders of the Constitution of the United States of America. I understand it's not official cannon, but here is the arguably nerdy preamble:



The representatives of the people of the United Federation of Planets, organized as the Supreme Assembly and the Federation Council, believing that the ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of Sentients are the sole cause of public calamities and of the corruption of governments, have determined to set forth in a solemn declaration the natural, unalienable, and sacred rights of Sentients and all citizens.



Here are the first seven (7) out of 15:



1. Sentients are born and remain free and equal in rights. The law must in all cases respect this principle.

2. The aim of all government is the preservation of the natural and irreversible rights of Sentients. These rights are liberty, property, security, conscience, expression, intimate association and resistance to oppression.

3. The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No individual may exercise any authority that does not proceed directly from the nation.

4. Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything that injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each Sentient has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights.

5. Law can only prohibit such actions as are demonstrably and objectively hurtful to society. Nothing may be prevented which is not forbidden by law,
and no one may be forced to do anything not provided for by law.

6. Law is the expression of the general will. Every citizen has a right to participate personally, or through his representative, in its foundation. It must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal in the eyes of the law, are equally eligible to all dignities and to all public positions and occupations, according to their abilities, and without distinction except that of their virtues and talents. The law may not designate any group of citizens and deny them equal benefits, standing, privileges or protections based solely upon their membership in said designated group.

7. No person shall be accused, arrested, or imprisoned except in the cases and according to the forms prescribed by law. Any one soliciting, transmitting, executing, or causing to be executed, any arbitrary order shall be punished. But any citizen summoned or arrested in virtue of the law shall submit without delay, as resistance constitutes an offense. Under no circumstances may any person be compelled to provide evidence or testimony against themselves.



Obviously, this not official canon, but is in the spirit what Mr. Roddenberry would have wanted.
edit on 24-4-2013 by MystikMushroom because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 24 2013 @ 02:30 AM
link   
reply to post by MystikMushroom
 


But any citizen summoned or arrested in virtue of the law shall submit without delay, as resistance constitutes an offense


Good luck with that one. If people break the law, they obviously don't care about it.

"Its illegal to break the law" (derp)



posted on Apr, 24 2013 @ 02:39 AM
link   
At only 44 secs. I loved it. Straight out and to the point.
I think Mr. Roddenberry along with many others had it right. I always hate the "slippery slope" argument, but there are some things it applies to that nothing else will say as clearly IMO. Forfeit one of your rights or one of someone else's and it starts a dangerous trend indeed.





 
6

log in

join