posted on Apr, 25 2013 @ 03:55 AM
Originally posted by dc4lifeskater
it was posted ealier.. but still I support the pauls but I don't know what he is talking about this... why would a police officer or a drone kill
someone for robbing a store for $50... that seems a little harsh.. Lets start with droning the banksters and politicians that walk out of their fancy
office after stealing $50mil-50bil from the american people.. Then we can drone the $50 guys at the liquor store.
I believe that what he is saying is there is very little difference. If a cop shoots and kills the perp in hot pursuit he will be just as dead as if a
drone got him. He also stated very clearly he doesn't want to see drones and heat seeking tech looking around in our back yards randomly without
I personally would prefer no drones period. Again, he said for it to be used only under the conditions like what we saw in the Boston scene.
I don't like the whole slippery slope thing but he did say that he was still concerned about privacy.
Like someone else said, Rand is not his father, and you know conservatives won't vote for Ron because they see him as weak in defense. Perhaps Rand is
stronger in defense than his Dad. Some people are really naïve about Defense. We really do have to have a way to defend against bad guys, and that
would include bad Chechen dudes.
The Liberals have been soft on terrorism and communism for decades. And now we see how well it's worked out. This Boston thing is one of the worst
things we've seen since 9-11.
With all the people here on ATS and in foreign countries who have shown obvious hatred of America, why do people refuse to admit there can be bad guys
with bad intent who know how to make bombs with pressure cookers?
edit on 25-4-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)