It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
not only that, if there WAS a nuke dropped on LA the casualties would be MASSIVELY higher then 31k
Originally posted by Abstruse
You know someone made a thread on here about someone predicting that incident about 2 years before it happened. The stranger thing about it was on a forum that literally had nothing to do with 'conspiracies'. Either way, ATS took it down. Why? I don't know... ATS is suppressive at times, which is odd if you look at the content that 'is' allowed.
Originally posted by OneisOne
It is explained here, bottom of the page.
Yeah . . . there was some timestamp manipulation here. If you look at the thread, the ID is 3417. Around that time, all other thread IDs were in the low to mid 1000's. Nice try though.
Yeah, it was done to prove to a Sandy Hook truther here on our forum that not everything "timestamped" on the internet is accurate. Things can be manipulated. But I guess that was lost on some people...
Originally posted by OneisOne
reply to post by Bilk22
From that forum's FAQ:
You may also post entries that have a time stamp in the past. This is useful for those entries that you just forgot to post and they work best in chronological order.
Originally posted by TheJourney
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
When was the last time someone had foreknowledge about a big disaster/event and then came back days later on here and said, "SEE! I posted that it would happen" .... ?
If it's a prediction, and it's posted on ATS...it won't happen.
Especially if it came from FB and "beforeitsnews".
Yup...the dark knight rises shooting was predicted by an ATS user...who then made another thread drawing attention to the accurate prediction...and I don't pay attention to that sort of # really.
Not that I believe OP...just sayin...edit on 24-4-2013 by TheJourney because: (no reason given)
not an accurate comparison
Originally posted by babybunnies
You do realize that "Beforeitsnews.com" is about as reliable as infowars.com as a source, right?
Sunday 28th April 2013, 12:00(not sure if this start or finish of the bet)
How many more nuclear tests in 2013?
Singles Only. Must be confirmed that a nuclear bomb signature has been detected by USGS and must be reported in a national UK broadsheet daily print newspaper.
Three or more 16/1
Originally posted by Ormuz
an interesting post,
Did some poking around and found this, dunno how legit it is so take it with a grain or two of salt.
Preparing for Major Terrorism Exercises Three Cities
if this actually went down, i would imagine that the fall out would travel..
when i see topics like this,
I'm grateful i live in Oz.
edit on 25/4/2013 by Ormuz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AriesJedi
I do not want this to happen so you better start praying, or according to this sick FB page nearly 31,000 die.
START PRAYING AGAINST THIS.