The Myth of the Working Poor, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 14-7-2007 @ 09:49 PM by dawnstar
5 or six kids, by four different men....um....ya know, I have lived hud subsidized housing quite a few times while my kids were young...(it wasn't subsidized for us by the way).....you're talking about some large families here....I've known only one....and they were all from the same guy, and he worked and lived with them....except for a small amount of time when the child welfare folks had him kicked out of his home because he was smoking cigarettes around the baby. I knew of a few families that size when I was growing up....but, that was a different time.

five or six kids, four different fathers....just one question....where were they fathers, I mean she should have been getting at least around $800 a month just from their child support...can we get all these dads out there refusing to support their children out picking up the trash also...

5 or six kids....let's say two of them are not school age.....well...that's $6 an hour extra the government will be paying her so she can pick up the litter. I've raised three kids...and ya know what...I spent far more hours on the go, chasing down kids, picking up after the family, doing laundry and cooking and the like than my husband would ever put in a day! a single mom with that many kids is working!!

the dads of these kids are abusing the system just as badly if not more than the mothers....maybe they should at least be picking up the trash along with her?? or at least be forced to pay the dang childcare bill or supervise the kids themselves while she does it.


reply posted on 14-7-2007 @ 10:44 PM by darkelf
As far as the health system in the U.S. goes; there would have to be a lot of changes before socialized medicine could work here. I was retired from the Navy (after ten years of service) on a disability. I am a disabled vet (70%) and have experienced the VA medical system in five different states. Each clinic and hospital, although part of a federal system, is a totally different experience. Waits for an appointment can be anywhere from a week to six months. Waits to see a doctor can be anywhere from 15 min. to an hour. Only the hospitals have an emergency room, and some don’t even have that. If you are experiencing a true emergency, you are told to call 911.

In order to be eligible for treatment in the VA medical system, you have to be HONORABLY discharged and at least 50% disabled, have a service connected illness/injury, or be a war vet,. This system is heavily over burdened as it is. Many clinics and hospitals cannot take on anymore vets.

As a disabled vet, I can have two appointments a year in the clinic here. If I need anything else, I have to make a two and a half hour drive to San Antonio to the VA hospital. In Nevada I lived an hour from the VA hospital with no local clinic. In Florida, the clinic was a half hour away and the hospital was an hour and a half away. My meds are free since I am over 50% disabled, but they are limited on the drugs that they carry. Most are generic. I was diagnosed with sleep apnea after six months of waiting for an appointment. A year and a half later, I finally got my CPAP but had to go to San Antonio to get it. I am not allowed to take strong pain medications due to my sleep apnea. I am allowed one set of glasses a year. Dental is only for those who are 100% disabled.

I have been unemployed for three years due to my disability, plus another disability I received on my job four years ago. I am about to be hired by another company soon and will have a decent health care program that I have to pay into. My husband has a good paying job and we hate where we are living, but we had to go where the work is. The cost of living here, plus the fact that I now have to raise my two teenage grandchildren (whose father has never paid a penny of child support) means that I have to go back to work. I am 54 years old today. If this is how socialized medicine works here, I would rather leave the civilian medical system the way it is.



reply posted on 16-7-2007 @ 05:03 PM by ChrisF231
Originally posted by goose
Originally posted by goose
You don't think the government gives to the rich pharmaceutical industries? Over there in the countries that subsidizes the phamaceutical industry at least their tax payers gets cheap drugs, over here all we get is $0 for our tax dollars they get.


Originally posted by edsinger
Last I heard the US government doesn't pay to have Merck or whomever develop drugs no...Look the Drug companies are plain robbing the American people of this I can not deny but giving drugs away is no fix either.


Last you heard, did you not read the link provided about how our gov. gives tax breaks to these people worth millions of dollars with no strings on how they spend that money? Who do you think is making up the difference in tax dollars for these companies? And, we are still paying a small fortune for our meds, many people choosing between food and medicine, and that's the lucky ones who can at least afford to see a dr..

Universal health care works better than the system we have now, it is working in 24 industrialized countries and it will work here. It beats the crap out of the system we have now. If you have a better idea, lets hear it. You continually say the government can't solve this problem, well their the only ones who can, unless you think the Wizard of Oz is going to do it.





[edit on 15-7-2007 by goose]

Yea but to those countries have 300,000,000+ people?

Canada's population is 33,000,000.
Sweden's population is about 9,000,000 - there are more people in the City of New York alone then all of Sweden.

Do you have ANY idea of what our taxes would look like for universal health care for 300 MILLION PEOPLE? The taxes are bad enough as it is ...


reply posted on 16-7-2007 @ 09:26 PM by dawnstar
hmmm....wonder if that is the same 50% that is receiving free and reduced lunches.....does it really make sense to have those who are having more than the taxes they are paying into the system given back to them on the basis of need? seems to me, you'd just have to give them more to make up for the extra taxes...

or, does it make sense to take more from those that are barely scrapping by..again, seems to me, you'd end up just giving it back to them, wouldn't you?

the hands that feed me....let's see...must be talking about all those immigrants that are harvesting the crops....no???

the resturant workers who deliver those yummy dishes....no??

my boss!!! no, wait a minute...my boss isn't hurting but he definately aint in the top 20 or 40 percential I don't think.

hmmm, let's see...just who could it be.....my mom's dead so it can't be her....my brother has helped us out of few binds...but again...he's not hurting but he ain't rich....

sorry, just can't think of anyone in those top income brackets that have done much of anything to feed me....

care to explain??

the best deadbeat story as far as dads goes is the one who had his ex ship the kids across the country to visit him...his mom paid the fare....but then...well..he decided he didn't want them there after all, and didn't want to pay to ship them back...so, well, he dropped them off at the nearest social service office. who was gonna put them in a foster home if she didn't come up with the money to get them home...she went around to everyone she knew begging for the money to get them home....he was a heartless jerk, she, I think was the dumbest women I ever knew...

I agree that the government really can't do much to fix this mess. anything program or legislation they come up with will quickly be torn apart, analyzed, and used by the masses for their own advantage....the rich will, the poor will, the conservative will, the liberal will....it's human nature I think.
but, I disagree that it's just the liberals working their way to that fine socialist system. the conservatives are working just as hard. too many employers want to pay squat for the labor provided to them. this produces a bunch of needy people who have to be dependant on something else...and at least one has expressed their view on this...if they are providing, then they should have a say as to how these people should act, what they should buy, heck, even forced work programs....freedom depends on independance.
doctors are now depending on insurance companies....the price they paid for the insane fees that they desire to charge though was that now, the insurance companies often times decide just how they should treat their patients. society feels they should have a say on how we all should be eating, ect.

seems to me that the rich, the poor, well, it doesn't matter, nor does political affiliation matter...they're all heading down that path to socialism....and the eventual loss of freedom.



[edit on 16-7-2007 by dawnstar]


reply posted on 17-7-2007 @ 03:14 PM by dawnstar
edsinger,

ya know......
I wake up about four or five times each night with my feet and legs cramping up... I walk down the stairs at home on step at a time....I don't trust the railings enough to try to alternate which foot I step down with. the rails at work are more trustworthy, I can let them support much more weight. just a slight jarring at work....stepping halfway on a mat, bumbing into something...hurts like heck!! and yet, I go to work everyday....do my thing...and pop lots of tylenol!!

a few months ago, I started getting a pain in my upper stomach...and ignored it. still am...even though now, there seems to be devoloping a nice lump there also. I have insurance, but well...I've been there, I've done it already with the foot...and ya know what, it didn't work...they're gonna wipe you out with their tests, their perscription drugs, ect...long before they ever even find out what it is. you're gonna end up thousands of dollars in debt, credit cards maxed out, and wake up one day and finding you ain't even got the money to put into the gas tank....it went into the perscriptions that doctor said you just had to have if some stupid test was to be taken...and you still won't be any closer to knowing what is wrong with ya than when you started.
no thanks...keep your medicine, keep you doctors, I'll keep my money till something is done to fix the mess! and considering the side effects of many of their medicines.....I'll probably live longer than many!

no, I am not jealous....but this country is self-destructing very quickly...
simply put....the lower income people don't have any incentive to make more...unless they can make lots more. if they do...they'll lose their healthcare, maybe their apartment....have to live on $30 a week for groceries for their family of 5....be cold in the winter...and well, it would take alot more than they could make to do actually have to pay for all that!! it's a very destructive policy.....having this gap between those that are eligible for assistance, and those that can actually afford to have what is given to them. the gap has been progressively widening the past few decades...especially when it comes to healthcare. and well....if given a chance between watching you child suffer because you can't get the medicine that would alliviate it, or downgrading you job to one that will make you eligible for the assistance that would provide it...which would you chose?



reply posted on 18-7-2007 @ 05:29 AM by dawnstar
a 20,000% tax increase on cigars??

that's part of the new tax tobacco to death for revenue bill congress is considering....all aimed at expanding the state run programs like child health plus....that attempted to close some of that massive gap..

again....why is it that a child's runny nose is more worthy of healthcare than an adult's diabetes, or arthritis, or whatever else?? why is it that I should have to pay more taxes so help expand these programs when I myself can't take two steps without pain, or walk down stairs like normal people do but know danged well the funds to even get a diagnosis for that will never come...

these programs were at least an attempt to provide some relief to working families in the US....TAXPAYERS...who were finding providing that healthcare to their families not feasible to their budget.....albeit, it fell short..of course it did...but at least it was an attempt!!!

but don't fear...your cigars and cigarettes probably wont be taxed more.
Bush vows to veto it....

---------------------------------

"The Bush administration may inadvertently come to the industry's aid. The president has vowed to veto the bill, not over the cigar provision but over objections to expanding federally financed health care for the non-indigent."

www.sptimes.com...

----------------------------------------

he doesn't want to help the taxpayers....has no gripe with helping the ones that are sitting at home not working, drinking their beer and having a good time!!
but not the taxpayers....the ones footing the bill for the good ole boys with their beer.

these programs were started by the clinton administration after someone pointed out to them that ummm...what was going on was UNCONSTITUTIONAL! as well as a little self destructive.....
....can't imagine who that would have been....

do I want them to further tax the tobacco companies to fund these programs....not really....

but something has to be done...you can't keep taxing the have nots to provide what they don't have to a select few...and the have nots are growing in number.


reply posted on 18-7-2007 @ 11:28 AM by edsinger
Originally posted by goose
Oh God if that isn't the typical response from a republican, drag out the old red, white and blue. Try and say anyone who says anything about impoving anything in this country is not being patriotic enough and not being appreciative of what they have.


Typical Liberal response, they have more I want some of it. Lets just 'stick it' to the rich. It doesn't work that way and it never will. I adhere to trickle down economics, low taxes for all, and growth. I am just stating fact, anytime the federal government has taken over something like this it gets more inefficient and the quality goes down. that is fact.

Originally posted by gooseYou state over and over that universal health care will not work, but you do not give any alternatives to it, so far universal health care is the only option anyone has put forth that might work. It works in 24 other countries and it will work here just as well.


It is not the only option and you keep saying how well it works in these 24 countries, let some of the people in the UK for example give some feedback on how well they like this so called 'Great System', heck ask some Canadians.

Do I have a solution? Well I can say this, what we do have is not working, that I agree on, but the last thing I want is the federal government to run it. There are other options, but either way we go, it is going to cost the US taxpayer MORE and MORE and we will get to the point that those with jobs will be taking care of those without jobs.


For starters, lets get the damn anti-lawsuit legislation started and get the pricing and growth of medical care in general under control.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



USDA Forces Whole Foods To Accept Monsanto
  Posted 11 days ago with 99 member flags
Greece wipes out Citizens Debt!! Tells Bankers to suck it
  Posted 12 days ago with 78 member flags
Obama on the verge of a deal with the banks
  Posted 17 days ago with 23 member flags
Bankers requesting that Greece become their debt slaves
  Posted 15 days ago with 15 member flags
We’re on the brink, warns Greece ahead of summit
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags
Heard a rumor on a disreputable anarchist forum....
  Posted 16 days ago with 12 member flags
The Real Story Behind the Greece Debt Default
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags