posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 08:25 AM
The surviving brother in the Boston attacks has been formally charged, but not as an enemy combatant, Why? Because in 2009 President Obama had Eric
Holder issue a statement that the term enemy combatant would be abandoned although the laws to protect us, not the terrorist, had been passed during
the Bush administration after 9/11. This helped us to capture OBL and others. So, since they do not use it, they cannot enforce the laws that were
passed, again, the protect the US and not the terrorist.
Right now, we all know that there was a 'cell' in Boston and in other cities. The FBI let that information out. We have seen the links from the
bombers and to AQ in Europe. We have seen and read who the older brother went to and where he was radicalized. So, since they were sympathetic to the
cause and based on that brought willful harm to the citizens of the US, that means it fits the descriptions that the Obama admin agreed with in 2008
‘Enemy combatant’ shall mean an individual who was part of or supporting Taliban or al Qaeda forces, or associated forces that are engaged in
hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This includes any person who has committed belligerent act or has directly supported
hostilities in aid of enemy combat forces.”
It was not just the bombing. They shot an officer in cold blood dead. They then car jacked another victim and had a 'gun battle' in the streets of
Boston with IED's. What else do we need? Multiple attacks on the US homeland against LEOS in the name of Allah and he is NOT an enemy combatant.
Here is where we start to split hairs though...is he a lawful or unlawful enemy combatant? According to the Military commissions Act he is a unlawful
enemy combatant. So, again, why is he not charged as such.
They called Ft Hood workplace violence. The president has yet to declare this an act of Islamic terrorism,,,and it is. What has happened to justice
for those who are killed in these attacks...what rights do they still have. From what I read, less than the ones who killed them to make sure they
edit on 23-4-2013 by esdad71 because: (no reason given)