It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by boncho
Yes, these laws were enacted following 9/11 by the LIberals. They then expired having never been implemented in a single case.
If anything, the apprehension of the Boston bombers and the would be VIA Rail bombers proves that they can catch terrorists without extreme laws such as this.
he Secret Trial Five
Hassan Almrei
Almrei, a Syrian-born refugee, had been in custody since October 2001, after CSIS accused him of links to al-Qaeda. He was freed to a strict house arrest in January 2009. A federal judge then struck down the security certificate, essentially freeing Almrei in December 2009.
Adil Charkaoui
The Morocco-born permanent resident was arrested in May 2003 on suspicion of links to al-Qaeda. Two years later, he was released on tight bail restrictions. The Montrealer is a teacher and father of three.
Mohamed Harkat
An Algerian refugee living in Ottawa, where he worked as a gas station attendant, Harkat was arrested in December 2002 and held for 3 ½ years before release on bail in June 2006.
Mahmoud Jaballah
The Egyptian-born man was released from custody in 2007 after being held for six years. He was teaching at a Muslim school in Toronto when arrested in 2001 over alleged links to Egyptian terrorist group Al Jihad. It was the second time he was arrested on a security certificate. The first was in 1999, but was quashed.
Mohammad Mahjoub
Also an Egyptian, he's accused of links to al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. The Federal Court ordered his release in early 2007, nearly seven years after Mahjoub's arrest on a security certificate issued in May 2000. On March 18, 2009, however, a federal court judge returned him to custody upon Mahjoub's request, which was in protest against his "oppressive" bail conditions.
Every person who, for the purpose of enabling or facilitating an offence under this Act, knowingly harbours or conceals a person whom they know to be a person who has committed an offence under this Act, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment
As I have observed US govt for years , the movements of the govt have taught me that US govt is going to do some particular actions after these kinds of events
1- Passing new bills and bribing more restriction on American people. Like patriot act ,TSA and gun control. So American people should be kept in fear of terrorists like popcorn in the pressure pot.
2- Blaming a country for these actions and start new invasions , like they did in Afghanistan. They will open the lid of the pot and those popcorn will pop out.
Elderlight
I do not have an issue with so-called "curbing" of my civil liberties to continue living in a safe society. Only those with something to hide will protest.
darrylss
I am in Canada.. meh I dont care... I think its a worry for those who have something to worry about, but if your like the average Canadian, we just don't really care, and good... we don't need these Shenanigans in our Country of Peace... Go hard I say...
yourmaker
The day this stuff starts effecting us though they'll wish they hadn't even bothered to try...
Originally posted by Elderlight
"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are really incapable of forming such opinions."
Albert Einstein.
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
Hi BoB
I would have thought everyone was familliar with the Ben Franklin Quote re
'those that trade security for freedom will have niether"
I would have thought that as well, but apparently Harper is fast tracking this S-7 bill based on the event with via rail today. Never waste a good crisis eh?
Cheers - Dave
Originally posted by Danbones
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
Hi BoB
I would have thought everyone was familliar with the Ben Franklin Quote re
'those that trade security for freedom will have niether"
I would have thought that as well, but apparently Harper is fast tracking this S-7 bill based on the event with via rail today. Never waste a good crisis eh?
Cheers - Dave
I read somewhere that Harper was ALSO using the Boston bombing as justification for imposing these laws upon us. While I don't know if this is true yet, if it is, using the TERROR of an event like that for political gain
is the VERY DEFINITION OF TERRORIST
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by boncho
Sorry, I should have said they weren't used in a single case that turned out to be actual terrorism.
You are being either disingenuous, or purposely misrepresenting the effectiveness of these laws.
edit on 23-4-2013 by TheComte because: (no reason given)
Yes, these laws were enacted following 9/11 by the LIberals. They then expired having never been implemented in a single case.
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Originally posted by unknown known
reply to post by Telos
What new bill was passed in Canada?
Harper is trying to get bill S-7 passed, the new draconian measures law which can be found here;
Bill S-7
Cheers - Dave
I thought this just brought back laws the Liberals set in place after 9/11 but had since expired... No?
I have never been a fan of Harper, but a quick check on reality is nice.
Originally posted by Elemetia
reply to post by bobs_uruncle
I can't help but see the guillotines lined up in the not too distant future.
And yet here everyone is..............................allowing it all to happen so why would we expect differently? We are just weak, ignorant and mostly uninformed and not particularly caring whether we are informed or not. It's tragic because as usual...............we are lambs to the slaughter.