It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by CALGARIAN
What about all the other footage of these guys? Why was that released, and not saved for the prosecution?
Originally posted by Krakatoa
I would guess that it is considered evidence, and will be presented as such for the trial. It's not often that evidence is given freely to the public, you know, to assure a fair trial of the accused? IF everyone on the planet saw the evidence before the trial, then there would be no chance of the accused receiving a fair trial anywhere, right?
You will just have to bite your lip, and WAIT for it to be released to the public, like everyone else.edit on 22-4-2013 by Krakatoa because: spelling and fat fingering....
Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by valmont325
Your right, it is the equivalent to the footage of the plane hitting the pentagon. Apparently they have it, yet we have not seen it! Release the tape, put to bed the conspiracy theorists, right?
Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by CALGARIAN
What about all the other footage of these guys? Why was that released, and not saved for the prosecution?
Originally posted by Krakatoa
I would guess that it is considered evidence, and will be presented as such for the trial. It's not often that evidence is given freely to the public, you know, to assure a fair trial of the accused? IF everyone on the planet saw the evidence before the trial, then there would be no chance of the accused receiving a fair trial anywhere, right?
You will just have to bite your lip, and WAIT for it to be released to the public, like everyone else.edit on 22-4-2013 by Krakatoa because: spelling and fat fingering....
Originally posted by winofiend
See this is what happens when you lack critical thinking.
They were SUSPECTS then, and being LOOKED FOR.
Now they are found, anything that could prejudice the case has to be withheld, so as to not make the entire case get thrown out of court.
You'd probably like that.
Originally posted by Krakatoa
reply to post by jjsr420
If they show it prior, then the jury pool could be tainted by folks seeing it without any lawyer present to explain or set the context of the video (as happens in court). Finding jury members that either do not have any bias, or (in the case of the defense) a leaning toward sympathy for their client, is how jury selections occur.
So to avoid this (which would be a circus even MORE than it will be), they are playing their cards close the their chest so to speak. The only ones to see it will be those involved int eh trial (lawyers, judge, jury, etc...). Once it is shown in open court, it will be i the public record, and available to the masses.
Unless of course a copy is "leaked" to the press first..........
Originally posted by jjsr420
Originally posted by Krakatoa
reply to post by jjsr420
If they show it prior, then the jury pool could be tainted by folks seeing it without any lawyer present to explain or set the context of the video (as happens in court). Finding jury members that either do not have any bias, or (in the case of the defense) a leaning toward sympathy for their client, is how jury selections occur.
So to avoid this (which would be a circus even MORE than it will be), they are playing their cards close the their chest so to speak. The only ones to see it will be those involved int eh trial (lawyers, judge, jury, etc...). Once it is shown in open court, it will be i the public record, and available to the masses.
Unless of course a copy is "leaked" to the press first..........
Ok.....so what you're saying is: Having a lawyer present to explain that the video is indeed showing them blow up (or...not blow up) people is going to change someone's mind? You're saying that, in order to me to have a unprejudiced mentality there HAS to be a lawyer present, otherwise I wont understand they're showing me a video of people blowing (...again, or not blowing) people up?
That makes absolutely NO LOGICAL SENSE TO ME!!!
May be me, but I highly doubt it. IMO, the footage should be released. It aint gonna taint nothing. Either it shows them doing it, or it don't; simple as that. Having lawyers, or a judge present aint gonna change reactions to a video.
Originally posted by Krakatoa
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
Whether you like it or not, that's the law. It is a criminal prosecution case now, not a manhunt. The rules have changed. I certainly hope you never have to learn this by experience.
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
Originally posted by Krakatoa
reply to post by DarKPenguiN
Whether you like it or not, that's the law. It is a criminal prosecution case now, not a manhunt. The rules have changed. I certainly hope you never have to learn this by experience.
I disagree.
This was a criminal prosecution since the beginning- One with the eyes of an entire nation watching. Something which has already been officially and publicly released (full description of the suspect dropping bag) in no way hurts a case to now show the pictures.
-We never seem to see the pictures, ever. I cannot understand this for the life of me. I DO NOT think everything is a conspiracy but I do think there is alot of lies and the precedent is being set to easily (if they wish) frame anyone for anything, show NO evidence whatsoever and easily get away with it. We need to watch the watchers.
We need to demand proof since we all know we will never see those pictures. or any of the James Holmes pictures, or anything else they tell us they have (and we never see.)
Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by Krakatoa
So then if these men did nothing, does that mean an INNOCENT man was killed? Why were they running from the police, and why did they murder a police officer? Oh wait, they are innocent right? You know, sometime, you just have to get justice the good old fashioned way. Truth is, this kid is lucky he is even alive, for now....
Originally posted by thesmokingman
Well I guess the non reading of his miranda rights will have no bearing on the trial, huh
Originally posted by olaru12
I find it astonishing the way some people rag on the media and call them a bunch of liars , but use it as the gospel truth, when it fits their agenda. How stupid is that?
It's pretty hard to believe the media or the authorities because neither one has a very good record of disseminating the truth. Thus everything is a conspiracy until I'm given enough information to make a logical conclusion.
The real conspiracy is between the authorities and the media to shape public opinion. Buy into it if it makes you feel comfortable. Take the easy way out and don't question anything....
P T Barnum had it exactly right. "There's a sucker born every minute"
edit on 22-4-2013 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)