It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VirusGuard
It now seems that it is against the law to ask who those guy were wearing 'Crafts' uniforms and happen to loss a rucksack during the boston bomb attack.
You can shout all you like but this will all be brushed under the carpet just like 9-11 was and the only thing that will changes if that americans are forced to give up more freedoms
Originally posted by captiva
Originally posted by Mamatus
The lack of everything being destroyed around the blast area actually has quite a simple explanation. To make it simple for folks I will simply ask; How many ball bearings actually fit in a pressure cooker?
Add some gunpowder and a timer and you have even less room for shrapnel. It was an explosive device but it was not like they used shaped charges, C-4 etc etc.
I love a good conspiracy but some of this gets just silly. I wish the Mods would make a rule about Boston threads...
So if I take your argument that their was no damage to the chairs or plastic cup still standing due to LACK of shrapnel.....What caused the supposed injuries at the forum cafe?...The Nay-sayers cant have their cake and eat it.
Now wheres my stalker?
Originally posted by captiva
The 2nd blast outside "The Forum" during the Boston Marathon, 1 of 2 blasts resulting in 3 deaths and 14 leg amputations did not damage any of the foam chairs, the legs of the chairs, and there are still salt and pepper jars and a plastic cup on the table........ Surely an explosion that ripped through leg tissue would have ripped through cushion foam on chairs, I think so....
Originally posted by Destinyone
Originally posted by Blarneystoner
I'm surprised no one has posted the article about the guy who had his legs blown off. Several pictures of him are circulating showing both legs missing with his Tibia exposed. Some questions posed include; Why didn't he bleed out? Why wasn't he attended to immediately? Why was he not brought in on a stretcher instead of a wheel chair? Why aren't his attendants covered in blood?
Too many questions and inconcistencies.
That article is probably the strongest evidence of a false flag op and it's nowhere to be found on ATS.
...probably my last post here.
That pic was debunked multiple times here already..It was also removed by staff each time it was posted, in honoring the sensitivity of his Family.
To continue to propagate such irrational claims...is siding with the terrorists who did his horrific deed.
Originally posted by Mykah
Actually you're wrong, I posted that and its still on page 15 of flashmuzzle's thread The Boston Bombing is a Farce to Take Your Rights Away. Its been picked up and reposted on several independent news sites.
It was not debunked, one guy claiming to be a EMT made really poor arguments which didn't address any of the evidence.
Its not an irrational claim, its medical observation supported with experience training and photographic evidence.
We are not siding with terrorists by seeing and speaking the truth.
Originally posted by Mykah
Am I to take that emoticon to mean you sheepishly roll your eyes when an EMT claims speaking the truth doesn't make him a terrorist.
Its cute to see the saturnists resort to childish rebuttle so quickly.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by Mykah
Am I to take that emoticon to mean you sheepishly roll your eyes when an EMT claims speaking the truth doesn't make him a terrorist.
Truth being the key word.
Its cute to see the saturnists resort to childish rebuttle so quickly.
If it's so childish then you should have absolutely no difficulty in countering my post? So why not just do that instead of calling it childish?
Originally posted by Cabalis
reply to post by Mykah
How about you call up the parents that lost their 8 year old son and refute the evidence of a bomb with them. Some of you cling to your conspiracy theory so much I can't fathom the amount of callousness you must have to ignore the fact that people were hurt, killed and maimed.edit on 4/24/2013 by Cabalis because: grammar error
Originally posted by Danbones
Originally posted by Cabalis
reply to post by Mykah
How about you call up the parents that lost their 8 year old son and refute the evidence of a bomb with them. Some of you cling to your conspiracy theory so much I can't fathom the amount of callousness you must have to ignore the fact that people were hurt, killed and maimed.edit on 4/24/2013 by Cabalis because: grammar error
Why not refute the poster point by point?
I realise that this is a site were debates take place, which of course is no place for a debate...
Its like saying we can't talk about how the gulf of tonkin incident now an admitted false flag, because its unfair to the millions of dead people that that fraud was used to justify killing
Or its not fair to discuss the bullet that made a u-turn because its unfair to JF Kennedy...