It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

PROOF Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's Back Pack was indeed photo-shopped

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:01 AM
link   


I see the patch, I see it! It was photoshopped, this is the best evidence i seen so far!


sorry here's the link: www.youtube.com...
edit on 22-4-2013 by sam_inc because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-4-2013 by sam_inc because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:07 AM
link   
Dang I wish I could watch Youtube videos at school



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:15 AM
link   
you are seeing something that I don't, the woman in front with the blue shirt, has different coloration and shadowing on her jacket, was she also photo shopped? the man against the wall to the upper right, his jacket has different shadowing effects on his coat, was that also photo shopped?



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:17 AM
link   
You see what you wanna see.

I see absolutly no proof of anything here, bad pixelation dosn't mean photoshop, niether does color change, as there are many other of those on other persons in that picture.
edit on 22-4-2013 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:18 AM
link   
reply to post by sam_inc
 


This is the stupidest "proof" I've ever seen. I'm all about conspiracy theories and I know this story is fishy, and they probably did photoshop pics. But this video is not even close to being proof of anything. Where's the before and after? How can he say that his arm position has been moved, moved from what? What is he referring to?



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:21 AM
link   
reply to post by sam_inc
 


give me a pic with a backpack and one without a back pack and them i might belive it.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:29 AM
link   
I suppose it's possible that the entire area described in the video was tampered with. The most damning evidence I see is the pixelation and change in angle of the bricks directly behind him where a backpack would be. That tells me that area was edited, and the only reason why would be to erase a backpack.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:31 AM
link   
reply to post by sam_inc
 


Do you also see the "photoshopped patches" all over that brick wall???

It's not photoshopped, it is just how the camera processed the brick wall...the same "patch" is absolutely all over that brick wall.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:33 AM
link   
These photoshop videos and rumors are getting annoying.. I think I'm a pretty open minded person about things like this but the pic really doesn't look photoshopped to me. His arm has varying shades of black and gray because of natural light and shadow. His fingers look the way they do because it is a still photo of a man in motion, his hand was obviously moving which left tracers of his fingers. There is no patch..

I do believe there is a lot of fishiness with the FBI and these boys. I know from personal experience when a member of my family tried to help stop the D.C. Snipers years ago BEFORE they got to D.C. they (FBI) did NOTHING to stop it. Even with plenty of evidence beforehand to prove they were preparing to kill and had done so in TX prior to their road trip.. The FBI, has their own agenda. They always have. Something is not right with this whole thing, but I don't believe they photoshopped the backpack off little brothers back...



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 11:37 AM
link   
Posted numerous times before.

Duplicate thread closed.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join