It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Beck Breaks Exclusive Information on Saudi National Allegedly Connected to Boston Bombings

page: 13
91
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by CIAGypsy
 


Start another thread or post on an existing thread. This thread is not about the legality of the searches in Boston...which as I understand it...they ASKED homeowners to search property...but a back and forth here is DERAILMENT from the OP topic.


You brought it up. Your quote....now you can't defend your own statement.

Classy....




posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by CIAGypsy

Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by CIAGypsy
 


Start another thread or post on an existing thread. This thread is not about the legality of the searches in Boston...which as I understand it...they ASKED homeowners to search property...but a back and forth here is DERAILMENT from the OP topic.


You brought it up. Your quote....now you can't defend your own statement.

Classy....


I brought it up as relevant to Glen Beck's witch hunt...but WTF if you want to press....Your claim is BS too...



At some point in the morning, they reconvened at a staging area and were deployed to a new search zone. In all, Saia guesses they went through 100 houses, many of them two-family homes. Over and over, they knocked on doors and asked to search inside.

“Most of the time ... it was, ‘Yeah, please come in, please check it out.’ People were extremely helpful. They really wanted that extra sense of security that nobody was in their house.” Along the way, he said they met a lot of “very scared people.”

When a homeowner said there was no need to search, they looked hard at the individual and situation to make sure the person wasn’t acting under duress, that the suspect wasn’t inside.

When nobody answered a knock, they checked around the house for signs of forced entry or anything that looked suspicious

www.salemnews.com...

Now...aside from a effen youtube video where you can't hear the conversation...please provide ANY evidence that the Watertown sweeps involved a single case of illegal search.

HAPPY NOW THAT YOU HAVE CHANGED THE TOPIC FROM GLEN BECK'S FALSE ACCUSATIONS OF THE INNOCENT TO THE WATERTOWN SWEEPS?


edit on 23-4-2013 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Indigo5
 


I see what you are saying. However is this information from the original source or a different one? Also if this is a non issue then why did Janet Napolitano react in such a condescending way when questioned? I will go on record and be the first here to admit that I do not like Mr. Beck very much. I will also let you know that I am not listening to him just because his story fits into my theory so it must be true etc. I will finally let you know that I have learned from this site that the truth is never in one place but scattered everywhere and it is up to all of us to dig through endless amounts of bull if we want to discover it that includes listening to all sources.

Now if this is the same source he has received the original information from then this is something huge. However Obamas meeting with the Saudi Prince which was unscheduled and originally open to the press only to be made private at the last minute , Michele visiting a victim in the hospital, the press conference and court hearings that were set up right shortly after this announcement only to be cancelled for undisclosed reasons. This all stinks.

In closing I will concede you this point, he may not be the right person. But something did happen and with all of these other strange happenings it really does make me wonder.

Trowa
edit on 23/4/13 by TrowaBarton because: punctuation errors



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrowaBarton

In closing I will concede you this point, he may not be the right person. But something did happen and with all of these other strange happenings it really does make me wonder.

Trowa


Wondering is good. Ask questions...but THEN look for answers, rather than eat what you are fed.

And "wondering" and "asking" are different than "claiming"...or broadcasting those false accusations on national ..yes right wing...outlets loudly...when a boys reputation and life are on the recieveing end of those false CLAIMS...not "questions". Eff Glen Beck.
edit on 23-4-2013 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 01:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by CIAGypsy
reply to post by Indigo5
 


It is my understanding that Beck's source for the story is Congressman Duncan. The evidence about the event file and the 212 3B is classified information and cannot be released to the public.


The information surrounding what DID or DID NOT happen in regards to this individual and the intel gathered on him is CLASSIFIED. Do you understand what that means???? It means you cry foul all day long that the story is not real because Beck has not produced the CLASSIFIED file to show you proof. Doesn't mean it's real. Doesn't mean Beck isn't full of B.S.


NO...Nice try though...If it was classified they would not comment...AS IT STANDS..



A senior law enforcement official with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) told TheBlaze Thursday that reports claiming the department was deporting Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi under section 212 3B (“security and related grounds”) and had opened an “event” (or file) on the Saudi Arabian national following the Boston attacks is “categorically false.”

www.theblaze.com...


Do you understand what "Categorically False MEANS???? It sure doesn't mean "It's Classified" or "No Comment"..


edit on 23-4-2013 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 02:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Indigo5
 


Um, dismissing someone or information from them because of their "bias" is a circumstantial ad hominem fallacy.;



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 02:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by Rubic0n
 


Now is a bad time to be a low information American.




It does look to be that way huh



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 02:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Indigo5
 


Um, dismissing someone or information from them because of their "bias" is a circumstantial ad hominem fallacy.;


And putting all your chips on the table defending and believing them and fox is considered patriotic or something like that? i'd rather not be one then. You just ate..it...up.... now , consider the source, again.

be a informed american ...pffff Good job there. Take some advice , press that "Off" button on your remote.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 02:45 PM
link   
Im wondering if all the people on this board right now saying that Beck is full of it and denying all the fur flying right now with congress over this issue......and the information coming out.....

Will come back on this thread in about a week and appolgoize for being close minded bigots.......


Because thats what is really going on here, they arent so much attacking the information that they seem to only have PART of when trying to challenge becks info.....and what you HAVE attacked is as simple as not understanding what you are reading.....for whatever reason youre missing it......

Instead they are trying to directly attack HIM.......

That is very telling indeed..........

I look forward to them coming back here and publicly admitting that they were wrong, and infact Beck was spot on with this..........

And if hes wrong, Ill come back and admit that he was way off base........


edit on 23-4-2013 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 02:59 PM
link   
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.

www.theblaze.com...

SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.
edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.

www.theblaze.com...

SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.
edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)


Wow.
Janet Napolitano talks in such circles I wonder if even she knows what she is actually saying.
But it sounds like - she knows more than she will say, and is talking around things on purpose.
She does now admit that the Saudi student was put on the watch list after the attack, then quickly removed.
But WHY?
Putting someone on a terror watch list is not done lightly.
And removing them must take more investigation than a day.
This also means she was not being honest when she was questioned earlier in the week.
What are they hiding?
edit on 4/23/13 by BlueAjah because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by blamethegreys
 



For clarity if i may :




“Before the [Tsarnaev] brothers became the focus of the investigation, authorities questioned a Saudi student who reportedly was on a terror watchlist,” Grassley said. “I sent a letter to you this morning asking for answers to questions about the bombers and how they interacted with your agency, I trust you will promptly respond…” “With regard to the Saudi student, was he on a watchlist, and if so, how did he obtain a student visa?” Grassley asked. Napolitano firmly responded: “He was not on a watchlist. What happened is — this student was, really when you back it out, he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. He was never a subject. He was never even really a person of interest. Because he was being interviewed, he was at that point put on a watchlist, and then when it was quickly determined he had nothing to do with the bombing, the watch listing status was removed.” [Emphasis added]



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo5

Originally posted by CIAGypsy

Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by CIAGypsy
 


Start another thread or post on an existing thread. This thread is not about the legality of the searches in Boston...which as I understand it...they ASKED homeowners to search property...but a back and forth here is DERAILMENT from the OP topic.


You brought it up. Your quote....now you can't defend your own statement.

Classy....


I brought it up as relevant to Glen Beck's witch hunt...but WTF if you want to press....Your claim is BS too...





Now...aside from a effen youtube video where you can't hear the conversation...please provide ANY evidence that the Watertown sweeps involved a single case of illegal search.






edit on 23-4-2013 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)




Pictures speak louder than words.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by BlueAjah

Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.

www.theblaze.com...

SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.
edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)


Wow.
Janet Napolitano talks in such circles I wonder if even she knows what she is actually saying.
But it sounds like - she knows more than she will say, and is talking around things on purpose.
She does now admit that the Saudi student was put on the watch list after the attack, then quickly removed.
But WHY?



Because he was there and of middle eastern origin who is here on a visa, Other then that ,he was being questioned as a witness. No clues to participation were found and so he got removed from the list. He is still on record as being questioned.



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Taggart

Pictures speak louder than words.


Pictures don't "speak" at all...again hundreds of homes searched...each and everyone they ASKED if they could search the premises...didn't enter any homes where they were denied...And you youtube evidence doesn't show anything to the contrary...nor do you have any evidence what-so-ever to dispute what both the residents of Boston and the Boston PD have described. So...no..your evidence doesn't "Speak" at all...



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by BlueAjah

Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.

www.theblaze.com...

SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.
edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)


Wow.
Janet Napolitano talks in such circles I wonder if even she knows what she is actually saying.
But it sounds like - she knows more than she will say, and is talking around things on purpose.
She does now admit that the Saudi student was put on the watch list after the attack, then quickly removed.
But WHY?



Because he was there and of middle eastern origin who is here on a visa, Other then that ,he was being questioned as a witness. No clues to participation were found and so he got removed from the list. He is still on record as being questioned.



except for the fact that he was already tagged AS a terrorist.......someone KNOWN .....and given a visa to go to school but wasnt living in the state or city where he was suppose to be going to school....

And just so happened to be there where the bombings took place......

Seriously come on people........



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by BlueAjah

Originally posted by blamethegreys
Oh shiiiiiiiit. Some people better suck it up.

www.theblaze.com...

SO I lied to you last week, but trust me on this. This is really what happened.
edit on 23-4-2013 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)


Wow.
Janet Napolitano talks in such circles I wonder if even she knows what she is actually saying.
But it sounds like - she knows more than she will say, and is talking around things on purpose.
She does now admit that the Saudi student was put on the watch list after the attack, then quickly removed.
But WHY?



Because he was there and of middle eastern origin who is here on a visa, Other then that ,he was being questioned as a witness. No clues to participation were found and so he got removed from the list. He is still on record as being questioned.



except for the fact that he was already tagged AS a terrorist.......someone KNOWN .....and given a visa to go to school but wasnt living in the state or city where he was suppose to be going to school....

And just so happened to be there where the bombings took place......

Seriously come on people........



Uhm , you aren't really up to date now are you ?



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Rubic0n
 


Actually I am, and have been following the story...........it seems you guys have some things mixed up, ive been listening and watching every day....

Ive also been keeping tabs on whats happening in congress with it...


Are you guys even watching or paying attention to the same stuff the rest of us are?

again give it a week when more information is out and we will be able to see a bigger picture.......


Just dont be afraid to come back and admit it , if all the information seems to be accurate....
edit on 23-4-2013 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:25 PM
link   
So has this guy been deported or not? Glenn Beck says DHS today claims they have no idea where he is.
What?

www.glennbeck.com...



edit on 4/23/2013 by sad_eyed_lady because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
So has this guy been deported or not? Glenn Beck says DHS today claims they have no idea where he is.
What?




Im trying to find out more information on that as well




top topics



 
91
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join