It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cbell77
I find it rather convenient that the kid cant speak. Talk about putting words in somebody's mouth. I heard a blip on fox news this mourning that he said there was no one else involved besides him and his brother.
Originally posted by keenasbro
I haven't got time to read all the posts (gotta go to work) so hope this is new and on topic.
‘We are at war with Russia, not the United States of America’: Dagestan rebel group distances itself from Boston bombers
In his statement the Caucasus Emirates commander urged reporters to “stop speculating and to stop promoting Russian propaganda. If the government of the United States of America is really interested in discovering the true organizers of the explosions in Boston … they should focus on the involvement of the Russian special services in the event.”
news.nationalpost.com...
Originally posted by snapperski
Not only was he shot in the mouth so he can't speak, he was also shot in the right hand, so he can't write either now apparently.
Originally posted by FlyInTheOintment
Well my mind is once again torn over this issue. I told my wife that I had made this thread, and explained the premise, and she suddenly remembered a dream she had last night.
In it, someone was telling her that the Jihadis had deliberately not claimed responsibility for the attacks, in order that masses of people in the USA begin to blame their government for the attack, that an event horizon may be reached as a result, with regards to people finally believing in huge numbers that false flags are a real and present danger to the nation. The ramifications of this paradigm shift according to the dream narrator would be open revolution, and it would herald in the End of the World as we know it.
She's had dreams that have come to pass, and the scenario of her dream is a plausible reason to describe why an actual Jihadi group perpetrating terrorist attacks would not claim responsibility.
I will reflect, investigate, and keep an open mind - I'll come back to this topic when I've had chance to consolidate & clarify my position.
NB - Just hearing news that the younger Tsarnaev brother is due to be charged with using a WMD, and so in tandem with his inability to talk due to convenient injuries to his 'throat and tongue' (laughably precise if you want to ensure he can't speak or shout out in front of witnesses), and a likely tightly controlled trial, we will likely never hear his side of the story in his own actual words. Death penalty on federal charges, case closed, job done..
Lots to think about.
Originally posted by ShadellacZumbrum
reply to post by MrInquisitive
After reading that I would say that someone does not have their facts in line.
It was announced this morning that the suspect would not be labeled an Enemy Combatant because they are certain that there was No Involvement with Other Groups or Individuals.
So, What's with that .. . .?
Originally posted by ShadellacZumbrum
It was announced this morning that the suspect would not be labeled an Enemy Combatant because they are certain that there was No Involvement with Other Groups or Individuals.
So, What's with that .. . .?
...White House spokesman Jay Carney said Tsarnaev would not be deemed an "enemy combatant".
"We will prosecute this terrorist through our civilian system of justice," Mr Carney said, after some Republicans had said Tsarnaev should have the same status as the "war on terror" detainees held at Guantanamo.
"The system has repeatedly proven that it can successfully handle the threat we continue to face," he said, adding that US law forbids trying citizens in military courts.
Originally posted by snapperski
Not only was he shot in the mouth so he can't speak, he was also shot in the right hand, so he can't write either now apparently.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by MrInquisitive
If you've seen/heard the video of them opening fire on him, he was NOT supposed to live. He is not supposed to talk.
Originally posted by Hendrick99
Originally posted by Cbell77
I find it rather convenient that the kid cant speak. Talk about putting words in somebody's mouth. I heard a blip on fox news this mourning that he said there was no one else involved besides him and his brother.
If they didn't want him to talk, they would have killed him. Plain and simple. No conspiracy there imo
“They were simply small cardboard tubes, they are filled with what appears to be flash powder, they are sealed at the end with wax and they have a fuse inserted,” Gallagher told WBZ NewsRadio 1030. “We’re concerned they are able to get the components on the internet fairly readily and that’s what’s making it easy.”