posted on Apr, 23 2013 @ 02:07 AM
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
“an attacker named Wu Huanming (吴环明), 48, killed seven children and two adults and injured 11 other persons with a cleaver at a kindergarten
in Hanzhong, Shaanxi on May 12, 2010.”
there are many such cases in china where guns are very strictly prohibited.
Ah yes China,imagine how many more kids and adults this nutter could have killed if he had ready access to the weapons used in the senseless masacres
in the US.Do you think owning high powered weapons rather than a hand gun would have made any difference to someone with a blade? heck someone without
self defense skills could have taken him on with a lump of wood.
This is a just a discussion board and the way I see it we wouldn`t be hearing these same conversations over and over again if you guys had a well
regulated militia,the adverage Joe might lose his high powered weapon/s if he doesn`t belong to the militia or have sufficient reason for owning them
and only have hand guns for personal protection,but the militia would/should be armed to the teeth,those weapons would be under protection 24/7.
The right to bear arms and a well regulated militia go hand in hand which is more than just a citizens right its a duty as it was intended,yet you
guys only fight for your own personal right.
I think the the armed forces should give allegiance to the militia first and foremost,then if in agreement follow orders from the leaders of your
country that the citizens elected to govern.
Australia should of had a well regulated militia in its constitution as well,at least that may have stopped Australians dying and paying for wars that
we followed in support (usual lap dogs) but were fed BS by the US government.Friends don`t do that.
But what I find most hypocritical is that many on this conspiracy site say they don`t trust their government and they`re after your guns and will
scream this even before the blood of the victims of these masacres has gone cold or it was just a set up,yet when other countries don`t trust the US
government and want weapons for their own protection from them just like yourselves, the majority (as I see it) want them wiped out before having the
ability of defense,again for the reasons of self preservation I guess.
If the US spent more money on defense and a heck of alot less money in offensive wars and bases around the world,you may be able to start reducing the
massive and increasing debt your country has.
At least something toward progress rather than this unmerry-go-round.