reply to post by Angle
Both that you are pissed, and that you will give us truth, is evidence you, too, have an ego. As do we all....in your other thread about shedding it,
you speak of it as though it is one, one persona, and it is plaguing all of us.
All of that differentiation is, as well, ego.
But we each have our own. That's the point. There is no shedding what is part of an individual; otherwise, there aren't any individuals. Maybe
that's the point....is that there aren't anymore.....
Or there's just this general desire to spread ignorance, deny truth and promote misidentification going on all over the place...and I, for one, think
that is completely and possibly the state of things....for it isn't ego, either, that has quiet, seemingly, beforehand nice, friendly and well
adjusted people, picking up weapons and blowing or blasting people and children away. And I only bring your own comments of one OP to another OP,
because they are both your OPs and both comments of yours on your threads.
edit on 22-4-2013 by tetra50 because: (no reason given)
Also, I do think there is a lot of codespeaking going on here at ATS, perhaps always was, but I cannot speak to that as I only starting even reading
here, four or five years after the website began, much less started posting. Regardless, back to the codespeak: I find one of the obvious words that
is used a great deal on this cite that one can see codespeak is being used in regards to and applies to is "ego." It is not one persona invading and
pervading and holding all people hostage, using them, occupying them, taking their souls and driving them to kill themselves or each other. But by
reading much of what is disseminated, written about and information spread here, one would think that is exactly what ego is....and your threads
demonstrate this misconception and then application of it (through this codespeak) in order to engender a mass judgement are a perfect example.
I am not attacking you. Pretty sure I don't even know you, so please do not take it that way.
edit on 22-4-2013 by tetra50 because: (no