It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Witness says Boston bomb suspect run over and executed by police!

page: 9
68
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:07 AM
link   
With all those many police officers, he jumped a police car and took off with it? I highly doubt it.




posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


Awesome, post them (the recordings) then. Oh, wait never-mind. Cause this is the kind of thing a jury should see in a court of law before a judge, not ATS etc, but it seems law enforcement, the media and the government make up their minds FOR us in advance now on whos guilty of a crime. Forget due process. Welcome to the new America where the "authorities" decide whos guilty before being proven innocent, in a court of law.. I mean innocent before being proven guilty. Oh nevermid, "USA, USA!" Everything is going haywire and people are cheering it on!

edit on 22-4-2013 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:12 AM
link   

“After a lot of gunfire and the use of explosives, I saw one of the shooters get back into his vehicle. He turned around on our street, and just floored it right into the Watertown vehicles, the police vehicles,” he said.


Skip to 1:18 to hear it from the horses mouth so to speak




posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by GrantedBail
reply to post by AmberLeaf
 

I did see a photo of the suspect dead. Someone linked to it on one of the threads that I visited. It was clear there were two entry wounds. One in area of the spleen, another in his forearm and possibly one in his left shoulder. I couldn't see the left side of his head but there was a lot of blood on the left part of his face.

It was also very clear that there was a large gaping surgical incision on the left side of his torso at the rib cage indicating they tried to intervene to save his life.

Just sayin



edit on 21-4-2013 by GrantedBail because: (no reason given)


After edit:

The blood and shoulder injury were to the right side, as well as the blood on the right side of the head and face. The surgical incision, wound to forearm, and entry wound at spleen area were all on the left side. Ooops Sorry
edit on 21-4-2013 by GrantedBail because: (no reason given)


"It was also very clear that there was a large gaping surgical incision on the left side of his torso at the rib cage indicating they tried to intervene to save his life."

He was taken to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center ..ya know..israelis ...body snatching...??



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:28 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:33 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by pacifier2012

* Rude Post *


Who you insulting??

Anyways, multiple witness now claim police run him over, last post i made from Today show says one was on the ground, shot, the other turned the CAR around and drove it into the police....so the SUV that ran the guy over was the police as suggested by the witness in the OP and in the Today show interview.
edit on 4/22/2013 by Majic because: Quote of removed post redacted.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:38 AM
link   
There were a lot of bullet holes on his body.

The gaping wound in his torso was first explained ( after his post Mortem photo emerged) as he had explosives strapped to his chest, then it changed to he was ran over, by his brother fleeing the scene.

They seem to be changing the story on the fly, based on what is being leaked, they create a story to explain it, wasn't them.

I'm starting to think with the angle about their mother saying FBI was onto them a few years ago, nothing became of it and was dropped. The brother has a history of being looked into about terrorism, so its no mystery he's a terrorist that did this bombing in boston. I don't think they did it. I think they scoured that crowd, having the public work for them, going through photos of guys with back packs and sending them in. They accumulated a large collection of potentials to choose from. Decided it would be these two brothers and these guys fund out they'd been picked when it was on the news so they ran because they knew this was serious and they would be captured and jailed or killed, so they resisted and hid of course, who wouldn't run from an accusation like that.

Listening to this witness in the video it sounds more like they executed the guy in a hail of bullets, ran over him, blamed the brother and said at first pipe bombs were thrown at them, now they threw a pressure cooker bomb.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by violet
There were a lot of bullet holes on his body.

The gaping wound in his torso was first explained ( after his post Mortem photo emerged) as he had explosives strapped to his chest, then it changed to he was ran over, by his brother fleeing the scene.

They seem to be changing the story on the fly, based on what is being leaked, they create a story to explain it, wasn't them.

I'm starting to think with the angle about their mother saying FBI was onto them a few years ago, nothing became of it and was dropped. The brother has a history of being looked into about terrorism, so its no mystery he's a terrorist that did this bombing in boston. I don't think they did it. I think they scoured that crowd, having the public work for them, going through photos of guys with back packs and sending them in. They accumulated a large collection of potentials to choose from. Decided it would be these two brothers and these guys fund out they'd been picked when it was on the news so they ran because they knew this was serious and they would be captured and jailed or killed, so they resisted and hid of course, who wouldn't run from an accusation like that.

Listening to this witness in the video it sounds more like they executed the guy in a hail of bullets, ran over him, blamed the brother and said at first pipe bombs were thrown at them, now they threw a pressure cooker bomb.


Im starting to believe it was them given all the new videos coming out.
Videos of them shooting the police and lighting bombs, pictures of them heavily armed in Laurel street where they had a massive gun fight and one was downed. He was run over by police 100%, but from what im seeing now, they did it....and they were actively fighting the police every step of the way.

Look at that today show link, its got a few pictures of them in the street armed....a thread i made which was trolled to hell by a couple of tards also shows the video of them exiting the car, shooting at police and lighting bombs.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:47 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by pacifier2012

Originally posted by captaintyinknots
As I said in another thread on this subject:

By most accounts, the boys were in a stolen Police SUV. Thus, it would be quite easy for this witness to get confused, since it WAS a police vehicle that ran him over.

Another non-conspiracy.



Don't worry, I perplexed at the weirdos on ATS making dumb comments about non-conspiracies too.

It's like an illness transmitted via the internet!


You are so wrong its unreal, they were NOT in a police suv!!! The suspect that was alive turned around and drove at police in the car they had stolen. The police ran the other downed suspect over....



1:18....he says it! You even see the car in multiple images!
Sorry, you are the weirdo not me

edit on 22-4-2013 by AmberLeaf because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 04:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Wookiep
 


Im not entirely sure what your rant is about...

If you are siding with the notion the police somehow planned this and used the guy as a scape goat and actually ran over him to klill him then you are no different than those you accuse in your post.

ironic



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:07 AM
link   
reply to post by AmberLeaf
 


So I watched your linked video a few times now..

Question -
exactly where does it state the police ran over the brother?



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:08 AM
link   
I can imagine the Police driving at him and IF he did have a gun shoot him numerous times.

Remember the woman says she did not see a gun but she was unsure, its night time, a normally black gun would be difficult to see.

It could be what happened it might not be, as we were not there personally and so far there's no video of the event we just have to take it as hearsay.



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by AmberLeaf
 


So I watched your linked video a few times now..

Question -
exactly where does it state the police ran over the brother?


They didnt, but the witness says the other suspect turned around, no mention of running over his brother, and drove at the police.

I think given the 2 witness statements, one saying the police ran him over in an SUV, and the other saying the suspect drove off towards the police kind of confirm the police suv that ran the guy over was driven by the police.


And of course the images of a car...not an SUV



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Mclaneinc
 


She states she couldnt see anything... Its only what she could hear..

"Did I see it?" I only heard.......

From what I can remeber.. from what I can hear....

Boston Special Forces.....

Me thinks she may be filling in the gaps with supposition...




posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


Me thinks your discounting her statement for other reasons.
I just replied to your comment directed at me with an explanation


1 witness describes a police suv running over the guy
1 witness describes a suspect fleeing in a car, with no mention of an SUV or someone being run over.

Explain this. They pulled up in a car, how did he then take a police suv which was 100s of feet down the road without facing the same fate as his shot to bits brother????? You are telling me, he managed to avoid being shot, jumped in an suv surrounded by police, went back down the road to run his brother over, swapped back into the car, turned around and drove off??

Heres another thread i made which was trolled to death, but shows the suspects jump out of a car, shoot at police, then light a bomb......jumped out of a car being the major issue with your replies.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 22-4-2013 by AmberLeaf because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:36 AM
link   
Let's Please Remember Our Manners

I've had to remove some rude posts which tend to poison discussion, and hope that's all I will need to do.

Let's please remember to focus on the topic, accept the fact that all ATSers are entitled to their opinions, whatever they may be, and that seeking to discourage our members from expressing them puts one in opposition to the AboveTopSecret.com Terms And Conditions Of Use, which is not advisable.

When you see trouble, please alert us, give us time to handle things and avoid the temptation to respond in kind. As always, if anyone has any questions or comments about this, or anything else, please don't hesitate to send me a private message.

Thanks to everyone who has remained courteous throughout.



edit on 4/22/2013 by Majic because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:36 AM
link   
Source)

Originally posted by AmberLeaf

Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by AmberLeaf
 


So I watched your linked video a few times now..

Question -
exactly where does it state the police ran over the brother?


They didnt, but the witness says the other suspect turned around, no mention of running over his brother, and drove at the police.

I think given the 2 witness statements, one saying the police ran him over in an SUV, and the other saying the suspect drove off towards the police kind of confirm the police suv that ran the guy over was driven by the police.


And of course the images of a car...not an SUV


If its a car then that is a second car jacking...

The first vehicle they car jacked was an SUV - A Mercedes Benz....
The second vehicle mentioned was (as reported) a Honda Civic green in color .


Source

​•​ A short time later, two armed men said to be the suspects carjacked a Mercedes SUV in Cambridge. The driver was released unharmed at a gas station.


Also something to consider (Ill entertain the possibility the police ran over the guy, however it could be possible they were the second to do so.

Reports stated as his brother fled, he ran over his brother.. They stated the brother was dragged underneath the SUV for some distance. If officers initiated a pursuit, its entirely possible that the body dislodged from under his brothers car, ending up in the direcrt path of a pursuing officer.

Its dark out, high adrenaline, shots fired / explosions...A person attempting to flee the area who has demonstrated they have no regard for life...

Just adding a possible scenario..



posted on Apr, 22 2013 @ 05:49 AM
link   
I thought that the younger brother sent a tweet out because he was angry that the cops killed the older brother. It seems pretty clear-cut to me. I don't even know why they are trying to hide it and blame it on the younger brother.

Anyway, can we all agree that the cops / homeland security at least somewhat killed him? I mean, even if he got run over, he was apparently shot multiple times.
edit on 22-4-2013 by darkbake because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
68
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join