Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by AmberLeaf
Il look for the archived scanner audio, but id imagine il be listening for hours and still hear no mention of a police car.
Please do. You WILL be listening for hours. And then you'll come on here and confrim that I am correct. A stolen police SUV is mentioned plenty of
Here's the problem. Your story is a "conspiracy" too because the police have since denied the "stolen police SUV" event heard on the scanner actually
happened. The OFFICIAL STORY from the authorities was that it was not a police SUV driven to Watertown but a Mercedes SUV stolen from a civilian.
Yes we heard on the scanner that they said a police SUV was stolen, but the police have since denied this. There is no room in the official story for
suspect 2 to be driving a police SUV, they had their own small car + a mercedes SUV they stole from a guy at 7-11, then the police tracked them down
in Watertown, this battle erupted, suspect 1 ran out of ammo and was tackled by police then suspect 2 ran him over in the stolen Mercedes SUV. That
is their story, there is no "stolen police SUV" in it. This is straight from the police chief on CNN. There is no mention of suspect 2 ever stealing
or being in a police SUV and no mention of cops ever shooting suspect 1 multiple times after whoever, cops or his brother, ran him over.
Thus, your argument makes no sense, you are essentially agreeing with the OP that their story does not match the witness' story without realizing it.
You are brushing away the differences in her account by arguing for something that the police themselves have denied happened (that a police SUV was
actually stolen) and calling people crazy conspiracy theorists while arguing for a conspiracy theory yourself because it conflicts with the official
You are acting like an asshat telling people to "do their research first before commenting" when clearly you haven't done yours if you did not know
that the official story from the police says that a police SUV was never stolen despite what the scanners said and only a civilian's Mercedes SUV was
stolen. It's rather hilarious seeing you flaming people, telling them to do research and learn the facts before commenting, then when your own
argument that a police suv was stolen gets proven wrong (according to the official story) you just change your argument with no shame for being so
hypocritical and wrong and keep on flaming people. Just sad.
We don't know if the girl is right, but to brush it off just because the cops said something different is just plain stupid. Cops have never lied
about anything to cover their asses right? Give me a break. Of course, it's possible she misidentified the Mercedes SUV as a police SUV, a good
interviewer would have asked her to describe the SUV but unfortunately this radio jockey didn't ask anything of value, but it is certainly worth
discussion because the stories simply don't match up. And as for how she misidentifies the police shooting a man who is lying in the street run over
and out of ammo, well, that's certainly another mystery too now isn't it. I can understand misidentifying a car in the dark, but it's pretty
difficult to be mistaken about a guy lying in the street being shot multiple times after being hit by a car...
It wouldn't be the first time cops have lied for each other to change the story and make themselves look better and cover up some possible shady #
like shooting up a downed and run over suspect. Of course, even if her account is more accurate, it doesn't automatically make this whole event a
grand conspiracy, it might just mean the cops maybe shot up a downed suspect and want to cut that part out of the story for obvious reasons. So
whether she is mistaken or not, perhaps she is, it is worth discussing, because the only non police witness to this particular event so far has given
an account which differs from the official one from police (who would have a reason to lie about if she was right). Flaming people and mocking them
as crazy for discussing something interesting like this is just low.
edit on 21-4-2013 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)