posted on Apr, 21 2013 @ 01:03 AM
reply to post by azureskys
Any time such a violent tragedy occurs people ask, "Why?" In this instance we might guess the motive being to cast this subject in a bad light because
of its now popular and lawful acceptance.
Old factions will continue to fight tooth and nail against this new reality as the realization sinks in that more and more communities, states, and
nations will have this in their very near future as an integral part of the normal and respectable lifestyle, that it is no long a matter of some
people advocating for a thing as it is now here and a reality. Many will step up to fight it. I suspect that could be what this incident is about.
This is an act of unwillingness to accept our future.
While other recent violent outbreaks were often based on political motives and religious ideologies there is also likely to be some of that involved
here as well. However, this will likely spawn more violence based on economic ideologies. THIS MATTER SITS AT THE HEART OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST
ECONOMIC UNDERGROUND. Sorry for the caps but that is an important truth to be emphasized. It is a multi-zillion dollar underground interest that will
collapse as this trend of acceptance continues.
Many very large and powerful interests on down to small personal concerns, both legitimate and illicit, all financially depend on maintaining the
former status quo. It is likely much too late for them to have that now, the vote already taken and the die being cast, but is a matter that is
certain to be fought over especially as this new industry gains its foothold.
Could this specific incident have merely been someone settling a personal matter? Could it have been just a random act of violence enacted during a
public gathering? Those are all possibilities we may never have answers for but my guess is that there will continue to be efforts made to cast this
matter in a bad light and atempt to turn public acceptance back around and away from it again. Let's hope it is not to be a future public
edit on 21-4-2013 by Erongaricuaro because: (no reason given)