It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SMR
There was no Martial Law.
Martial Law must be declared and it was not. It doesn't just happen.
Can anyone show where State, City, or otherwise declared Martial Law ?
There were no curfews. No Arrests made for not letting Law Enforcement check homes (which by the ay, they ASKED and nobody was forced)
There was as much Martial Law in Boston as there was when a robbery suspect was being chased the other night down the street from me. NONE !
Originally posted by tl1977
reply to post by 0zzymand0s
How was that a circus? The brothers were caught within 24 hours, and they wouldn't have caught the 2nd brother if there wasn't a lockdown. I followed this the entire time they were hunting down the 2nd brother, and they actually did a good job!
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
Wait- They didnt find him and he was found after the lockdown by a guy checking his boat (a civilian)- Did we listen to the same thing or are you being sarcastic?
Originally posted by tl1977
reply to post by DirtyD
You can't speculate as to what would have happened if someone refused. You don't know if they would have searched anyway or not.
Originally posted by SMR
reply to post by DirtyD
They had 2 helicopters, police, swat and they were searching peoples properties (backyards, sheds, garages)
So by adding Military help, that defines Martial Law ?
You guys are silly
It's more than just military help, it was the complete shut down of an entire metropolitan area, public transportation shut down, no taxi's, police checkpoints, and heavily armed tactical police squads going door to door, into people's homes and searching.
You are correct, by definition Boston was not under Martial Law, but it was about as close as you can get.
Originally posted by SMR
It's more than just military help, it was the complete shut down of an entire metropolitan area, public transportation shut down, no taxi's, police checkpoints, and heavily armed tactical police squads going door to door, into people's homes and searching.
Gee. I wonder why ...
You are correct, by definition Boston was not under Martial Law, but it was about as close as you can get.
It either IS or is not. No in-between. Sorry.edit on 4/21/2013 by SMR because: Removed repeating quote
Why does Boston celebrate Martial Law with chants of ‘USA, USA’?,
Originally posted by DarKPenguiN
Originally posted by SMR
It's more than just military help, it was the complete shut down of an entire metropolitan area, public transportation shut down, no taxi's, police checkpoints, and heavily armed tactical police squads going door to door, into people's homes and searching.
Gee. I wonder why ...
You are correct, by definition Boston was not under Martial Law, but it was about as close as you can get.
It either IS or is not. No in-between. Sorry.edit on 4/21/2013 by SMR because: Removed repeating quote
I wish it were that simple.
I am more concerned about the militancy of the Police than the fact the National Guard was used (The Guard is there to assist the State)- Its the fact that if the Police are a military (which they are becoming) a "declared" martial law makes no difference as we are essentially under an undeclared martial law at their discretion.
If the Police has Tanks, machine Guns, Drones and Military tech, is trained as and functions as a Military- They "are" a military for all intents and purposes.
This really is eye opening as to how the lines between Police and Military is nearly gone- Regardless of "false Flag" or not, this show of force and the seeming suspension of Civil Rights in what looked like a Military operation- Is scary. The acceptance by the public is also concerning although expected.