" A monolithic and ruthless conspiracy"

Another piece is this JFK Library Explosion. Boston Apr 2013

Its oddly peculiar that a man who was voted into office because NIXON lost the televised debates, and was opposed to secrect societies and has publically stated this...



"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know."

A Monolithic and Ruthless Conspiracy"

Was assassinated on 11/22/1963 and replaced by his successor who was know to have backed the Vietnam war that JFK opposed and Nixon licked his chops over

If you want a tingly feeling down your spine, I suggest listening to the speech inside the link

While it may appear to seem absurd...
Know this... JFK was assassinated because he was a Roman Catholic.
The example was made of him because Knight templars were in control of the Americas.
It was designed to teach the popes that no matter what level of officials the papacy shall not prevail.

reply to post by Pinocchio


Here's a joke that might amuse you... What did Raggedy Anne say when she sat on pinocchio's face?

If I'm not mistaken... I think she said "would you?"

reply to post by Pinocchio


yeah yeah you're my friend. defeats the purpose of the joke. she is supposed to sit on his face

reply to post by Pinocchio

Know this , JFK was killed because he opposed the NWO and was trying to defeat the Federal Reserve Bank System . He opposed the powers that be in this world, the Banksters . His Executive Order 11110 was to make the Federal Reserve Note worthless .
The Protocols of Zion will enlighten you .

reply to post by Pinocchio

WOW!
I didn't know that!

But I suppose Raggedy Anne proposed to you to tell her some more lies, am I right?
And after that she proposed to you some more?

A

reply to post by whatzshaken

Actually JFK called for greater secrecy. Read the entire speech, not just one paragraph.

EDIT: He was addressing the issue of freedom of the press and national security, not the opinion of private fraternal organizations.

reply to post by KSigMason


I am glad you brought that up because I actually did so here are a couple links for you to read or even listen to the whole speechkeendy's speech arned against secret societies

The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years.

As well you may notice if you hit the link above on this site it will take you to the is the JFK Libray yet the speech is NOWHERE to be found unless you do some digging.
JFK FULL TRANSCRIPT

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.

Does this sound like a man who wants more press control

reply to post by KSigMason


EDIT: He was addressing the issue of freedom of the press and national security, not the opinion of private fraternal organizations.

yes those issues were raised, but read the transcripts, he's talking about the public being "illuminated"

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future--for reducing this threat or living with it--there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security--a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

he alludes to the power secret societies now have and the facets of life they have infiltrated

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

An out spoke man against secret societies, and the last President assassinated.


Read his words" that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day" and ask yourself compare these words to the events that just transpired.

they release their photos at 5 pm and the man hunt started when everyone was in bed.

The concept is too much for some people when you are dealing with a conspiracy that spans hundreds and hundreds of years. logically it does not make sense, but the proof is there. There is always a paper trail

Originally posted by SimonPeter
Know this , JFK was killed because he opposed the NWO and was trying to defeat the Federal Reserve Bank System . He opposed the powers that be in this world, the Banksters . His Executive Order 11110 was to make the Federal Reserve Note worthless .
The Protocols of Zion will enlighten you .

That executive order actually gave more power to the Federal Reserve as it eliminated Silver Certificates and enabled the Federal Resereve to print more unbacked Federal Reserve Notes (dollars).

Originally posted by whatzshaken
An out spoke man against secret societies, and the last President assassinated.

That is the typical toolbag conspiracist's take on the speech.

Read this thread which methodically details how the speech was in reference to the recent failed Bay of Pigs invasion and Soviet communism.

The speech has been done ad nauseum on this site.

reply to post by whatzshaken

A monolithic and ruthless conspiracy"

The JFK assassination was a major turning point for this nation.

The speech you quoted, taken into context with the 'military/industrial complex' subject spoken of by Kennedy's predecessor, Dwight Eisenhower, suggests that both men saw what was coming and were trying to warn the public and those around them in government.

With the loss of Kennedy and then two pro-military/industrial complex presidents (Johnson and Nixon) covering nearly a decade thereafter, things did indeed change. America took a new course, the rocky destination of which becoming more and more apparent on the horizon with each succeeding election.

Originally posted by redoubt
The speech you quoted, taken into context with the 'military/industrial complex' subject spoken of by Kennedy's predecessor, Dwight Eisenhower, suggests that both men saw what was coming and were trying to warn the public and those around them in government.

Then why did Eisenhower get us involved in Vietnam and why did Kennedy continue to escalate our participation?

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus


Puppets on a string.

It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Think Deep

Originally posted by whatzshaken
Puppets on a string.

...

Think Deep

So Kennedy was a puppet that warned us that he was a puppet?

Just think, period.

Kennedy opposed these secret societies, that is why he was killed, Who was he running against in the elections?

NIXON.

Why did NIXON loose?

Televised debates.

Who became president after Kennedy in the next election?

Nixon

what war did he follow through on?

Vietnam?

and simply put,

Watergate.

"I am not a crook."

Lyndon Johnson succeeded John F Kennedy as president. Like many ‘hawks’ in the White House, Johnson was a fervent supporter of the ‘Domino Theory’ and he was keen to support South Vietnam against the NLF:

Lyndon Johnston on Vietnam

"In 1961, Kennedy agreed that America should finance an increase in the size of the South Vietnamese Army from 150,000 to 170,000. He also agreed that an extra 1000 US military advisors should be sent to South Vietnam to help train the South Vietnamese Army. Both of these decisions were not made public as they broke the agreements made at the 1954 Geneva Agreement.


JFK Vietnam History
It was during Kennedy’s presidency that the ‘Strategic Hamlet’ programme was introduced. This failed badly and almost certainly drove a number of South Vietnamese peasants into supporting the North Vietnamese communists. This forcible moving of peasants into secure compounds was supported by Diem and did a great deal to further the opposition to him in the South. American television reporters relayed to the US public that ‘Strategic Hamlet’ destroyed decades, if not hundreds, of years of village life in the South and that the process might only take half-a-day. Here was a super-power effectively orchestrating the forced removal of peasants by the South Vietnamese Army who were not asked if they wanted to move. To those who knew about US involvement in Vietnam and were opposed to it, ‘Strategic Hamlet’ provided them with an excellent propaganda opportunity.



Kennedy was informed about the anger of the South Vietnamese peasants and was shocked to learn that membership of the NLF had increased, according to US Intelligence, by 300% in a two year time span – the years when ‘Strategic Hamlet’ was in operation. Kennedy’s response was to send more military advisors to Vietnam so that by the end of 1962 there were 12,000 of these advisors in South Vietnam. As well as sending more advisors to South Vietnam, Kennedy also sent 300 helicopters with US pilots. They were told to avoid military combat at all costs but this became all but impossible to fulfil.



Kennedy’s presidency also saw the response to the Diem government by some Buddhist monks. On June 11th 1963, Thich Quang Duc, a Buddhist monk, committed suicide on a busy Saigon road by being burned to death. Other Buddhist monks followed his example in August 1963. Television reported these events throughout the world. A member of Diem’s government said:



“Let them burn, and we shall clap our hands.”



Another member of Diem’s government was heard to say that he would be happy to provide Buddhist monks with petrol.



Kennedy became convinced that Diem could never unite South Vietnam and he agreed that the CIA should initiate a programme to overthrow him. A CIA operative, Lucien Conein, provided some South Vietnamese generals with $40,000 to overthrow Diem with the added guarantee that the US would not protect the South Vietnam leader. Diem was overthrown and killed in November 1963. Kennedy was assassinated three weeks later."

Originally posted by whatzshaken
Kennedy opposed these secret societies, that is why he was killed, Who was he running against in the elections?

Kennedy was in a 'secret society', he was a member of the Knights of Columbus.

Who became president after Kennedy in the next election?

Nixon

Uh, no my history challeneged friend, Johnson won the next election.