It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grandmastersam2287
reply to post by Covertblack
engage in gunfire u said with cops right? do you have evidence? have you seen footage? are they on the video? or are u going of what the media told you and your so trustful government
Originally posted by NorEaster
Immediately after the 9/11 attacks, we got blitzed with the new "War on Terror", which morphed quickly to include The Patriot Act, The Dept of Homeland Security, Operation Iraqi Freedom, 16 new private sector, government funded intelligence agencies, the TSA, and trillions of Treasury dollars down a rat hole. The reason for the 9/11 attacks was really obvious and really aggressively imposed on all of us.
My only immediate thought - when the bombings happened - was that the same *ssholes who have the pounds of Anthrax still hanging over our heads decided to "punish" the Obama Admin for allowing the Bush Tax Cuts to expire for the top tier on January 1st, with a small show of terror on Tax Day - in Boston, (Boston Tea Party) for extra emphasis. But then, I always follow the money when something significant happens, and have always assumed that there's been a lot more happening behind the public displays between the senders and the receivers since the 9/11 attacks and all the insanity that's become our "new normal" ever since.
The bottom line in any professional world-class terror attack is the after-event marketing impact, and in this case - so far, at least - there isn't any after-event marketing impact that's obvious or even apparent. In the Middle East areas, the marketing impact is pretty clear - "stay here and your stay here will be violent and dangerous". That's easy to understand and there's no need for a press release.
. The Boston Marathon bombings don't make any sense in that there's no after-event marketing effort, and certainly no after-event marketing effort being launched by the US government.
Then again, this has been one hell of a busy news week, and most folks never noticed the gun control vote in the Senate that killed off even basic background checks.
Hell, maybe we should be looking hard at the NRA for luring in the older brother here? Those GOP lawmakers needed some cover, especially given the outrage over Newtown and the fact that the background check bill polled positive at over 90%.
Originally posted by buckrogerstime
For a start, the BEST evidence you have comes from the mouth of the terrorist's father. Could you imagine a more biased source?
Your other "best evidence" is that law enforcement shot the suspect's sibling. I would venture to say this "evidence" actually corroborates the mainstream story.
The evidence we have supporting the mainstream account is that the suspects were caught on tape behaving suspiciously at the marathon
as well as positively ID'd by a victim
and they had made many statements indicating religious/nationalist fanaticism.
Originally posted by Deetermined
The oldest son spent six months in Russia from Jan - July 2012 before returning back to the states.
Did the FBI drop the ball or let it play out to see how far they were willing to go?
Or is the mother a liar? Apparently there's a warrant out for her arrest here in the states for shoplifting $1,600 worth of merchandise last year while she was here.
Originally posted by grandmastersam2287
reply to post by Covertblack
One day you will understand that a government cannot serve two masters, the government of the usa does not serve its people if it did it wouldnt send your boys overseas to die for heroin and oil and then tell you its because of the war on terror. Your governemnt has the biggest prison population in the world, the war on drugs is a war upon itself and it can never be won just like the war on terror they make you believe their is this big bad muslim bully waiting to harm everyone yet the only one harming and killing inncoent people is them, the only country to ever use an atomic bomb is the USA NOT IRAN NOT IRAQ, sadam had no WMD but yet they managed to kill 1 million innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan
Americans are largely unaware of the enormity of the crimes committed by their government (or rather, by individuals within their government). But in a representative democracy, such as allegedly exists in the U.S.A., can the people deny responsibility for the actions and policies of their government? How long can they allow their government, whose leaders they elect, to commit one atrocity after another and at the same time pretend that they themselves are innocent of any wrong-doing?
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Once again...To suggest our government is credible as either a flawless evil entity or even a functional government is like suggesting a guy winning 100 million with lotto was pure skill....
Originally posted by trenck
reply to post by grandmastersam2287
AND BY THE WAY:
YOU CALL ME A HATE MONGER, WHEN YOUR AVATAR SAYS ENOUGH ABOUT YOU
TSK TSK
HOW OLD ARE YOU ? KINDERGARTEN ?
SOME GRANDMASTER........
Originally posted by grandmastersam2287
love your hate mongering post, really shows how much you know about islam.Islam Condemns Violence
Islam considers all life forms as sacred. However, the sanctity of human life is accorded a special place. The first and the foremost basic right of a human being is the right to live. The Glorious Quran says:
Quran 5:32
“…if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people.”
Such is the value of a single human life, that the Quran equates the taking of even one human life unjustly, with killing all of humanity. Thus, the Quran prohibits homicide in clear terms. The taking of a criminal’s life by the state in order to administer justice is required to uphold the rule of law, and the peace and security of the society. Only a proper and competent court can decide whether an individual has forfeited his right to life by disregarding the right to life and peace of other human beings.